It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: nwtrucker
P.S. Salmon runs on the west coast are currently running well within the norms by Canadian and U.S. estimates.
These salmon require food. LOL. Apparently, there is no unusual shortage whatsoever.
Therefore, regarding this thread? YAWN...
Although the radioactivity concentrations remain extremely low – less than one becquerel per cubic metre of water – they have allowed the scientists to start to validate the two models that are being used to forecast the probable future progression of the plume.
One of these models anticipates a maximum concentration by mid-2015 of up to 27 becquerels per cubic metre of water; the other no more than about two becquerels per cubic metre of water.
Bedford’s Dr John Smith told BBC News that further measurements being taken in the ocean right now should give researchers a fair idea of which model is correct.
Water sample
Citizen science project ourradioactiveocean.org is collecting water samples
And he emphasised again: “These levels are still well below maximum permissible concentrations in drinking water in Canada for caesium-137 of 10,000 becquerels per cubic metre of water – so, it’s clearly not an environmental or human-health radiological threat.”
Dr Smith was speaking at the Ocean Sciences Meeting 2014 in Honolulu, Hawaii.
He was joined on a panel discussing Fukushima by Dr Ken Buesseler from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
originally posted by: RickinVa
Said it once and I will say it again.....
IF there was enough radiation leaking from Fukushima to kill the sea life on the west coast of the US.... IF.. I can promise you would have a whole lot worse problem than just dead sea life... there would be a crap load of dead humans too.
It's just not logically possible for this to happen. Most people conveniently choose to ignore that most of these mass die offs were occurring before 3/11/2011.
originally posted by: Psynic
The first of the USN Sailors aboard CVNRonald Reagan has died from the cancer that developed from the radiation he and 80 other crew were exposed to and were/are suing TEPCO over.
There is an incubation period, currently taking place, that will soon break into the mass deaths you predict.
There has never been a Sea Star die off that spanned the dozen plus varieties we see affected now. This phenomenon has NO precedent in the nuclear age and CERTAINLY none from pre WWII.
The number of marine species currently experiencing massive die-offs has NEVER been seen before and includes whales, orcas, dolphins, sharks, swordfish, tuna, salmon, cod, halibut, herring, salmon, sardines, anchovies, sea lions, polar bears and sea birds, including pelicans and eagles.
That is the inconvenient truth you seem to be ignoring.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: RickinVa
Not to mention if that much destruction on the west coast of Canada, wouldn't the things be all that much worseon the other side moving up from Japan, along China's coast and so on? Far worse? Far sooner?
Trash binned...
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: boncho
All of you are really silly. There have been huge problems with the ocean long before Fukashima.
The FIRST thing you need to learn is how to spell 'Fukushima'.
The second is, there's NO PRECEDENT for the die-offs, beachings, collapsed fisheries, and species extinctions most likely happening because of the hundreds of tons of tritium DAILY thats been spewing, NON STOP for three and a half years into the Pacific Ocean.
The researchers collected plankton at 10 points in the Pacific from off Hokkaido to Guam between January and February 2012.
They detected cesium-134 in plankton at all 10 points. The density of radioactive cesium was the highest at 8.2 to 10.5 becquerels per kilogram in samples collected
originally posted by: Char-Lee
I have lived here on the West coast for 20 years and the tide pools full of creatures were always the same, now the tide pools have nothing living even the plants are gone mostly. We did see in hours of looking only a small snail in a shell, normally the starfish are everywhere and the sea anemones.
We have to understand that the plankton and plants feed the larger animals which then are fed on by larger animals up the food chain, how will that turn out.
They only found 4 species of animals, all other have disappeared.
originally posted by: GaryN
a reply to: Regenstorm
They only found 4 species of animals, all other have disappeared.
What a lot of nonsense, I live on the west coast and everything is just fine. Right now the salmon boats are out on the Fraser river hauling in part of what should be a record return, all beautiful healthy fish that have been feeding along the coast and in the Pacific for 4 years. Are the members of this forum all working for enenews now?