posted on Aug, 12 2014 @ 05:43 PM
originally posted by: mattsawaufo
I stand by my OP. It's the product of twenty years of observations in real world settings. I would like to point out for the betterment that all skin
colors think with the exact same thinking because they are the same. It's not gonna be successfully refuted very easily. Good luck trying though.
To the last post I guess you've never heard an aroused woman say "my ***** is so wet it's driving me crazy"
I may have heard it once or twice sure.
Once again though, what is driving her crazy is being aroused without, for whatever reason, the ability to have her desires met. I just think it's a
bad choice of wording for "Sexual Arousal" to be considered having desire without means of gratification. I understand what you're saying.
More specific is I even used your own definitions and examples in the OP. How can "Sexual Arousal" be pain while "Increased Blood Flow"
pleasure?? "Sexual Arousal" includes as a primary function, "Increased Blood Flow".
If you don't want to agree, fine, keep it your way. I'm really tired of arguing such a small detail since it's detracting from everything else at
this point, including my other questions. I've now become sick of the whole conversation at this point.