It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I really don't understand why folks ever accuse the wingnuts of being racists ...
Question, is the entire country of Canada racist?
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Gryphon66
Here is one case in one county in NC. Just one.
And she had 16 counts against her. I think your source is garbage as is your premise.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I really don't understand why folks ever accuse the wingnuts of being racists ...
Question, is the entire country of Canada racist?
originally posted by: paxnatus
No voter fraud huh?? Let's look at the evidence! And heads up, just because you do not like the source, does not change the facts!!
There is a video detailing Voter fraud in Ohio:foxnews
dispatch.com
Fox News
And many, many more!!
Pax
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Gryphon66
I'd think the lefties would be gleeful for this.
Many on the right say that voter fraud gets progressives elected.
With voter ID, the righties would have no argument then.
The progressives could just laugh and laugh.
As usual, your terminology is muddled.
Are "the lefties" also "the progressives" also "the liberals" also "the Democrats"?
As opposed to what "The Only Honest and True American Party of Freedom, Justice and God's Will" aka the Republicans?
No "independents" in there? How 'bout the "moderates"?
Gotta pick a side, right? Red Hats Good, Blue Hats Bad?
Notice above, the reality of 34 states requiring Voter ID in one form or another ... so that "problem" is solved.
What next? Literacy tests? Need to own property to vote? Or should we just let the State Houses decide everything?
We ALL KNOW how honest local politics are, amirite?
originally posted by: poncho1982
Yes VALID free Basic ID's should be provided in any state with Voter ID laws. BUT, it is the citizen's responsibility to go get one. It's the 21st century, there are multiple modes of transportation to choose from. Even free services. No excuses.
It is not Government's role to coddle you, just give you the opportunity to voice your opinion and vote.
And as far as property owner votes, yes in some instances you should be a property owner in order to vote. Any kind of issue that pertains to property taxes for instance. Why should someone who doesn't own land be able to vote on that? It's common sense again.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
*snip*
Give it up, you've been caught Progs. One of your weapons in winning elections may soon disappear. And that was the ONLY reason you wanted a simple thing like identification to vote. You've again proven what I know...you will lie, cheat and steal to get your way. No law or constitution will stand in your way.
originally posted by: Metallicus
This is a good thing. We should know who is voting...especially now with all the undocumented criminals coming into our country.
originally posted by: Metallicus
This is a good thing. We should know who is voting...especially now with all the undocumented criminals coming into our country.
originally posted by: defcon5
originally posted by: Metallicus
This is a good thing. We should know who is voting...especially now with all the undocumented criminals coming into our country.
I disagree.
Nowhere in the constitution does it say you must provide a photo ID to Vote, only that you be a citizen. There are lots of other ways to prove citizenship. This Photo stuff is just another excuse to require compliance with the Real ID, and facial recognition tracking databases. The Voters ID is the only remaining “B-List” identity document that doesn't require a FR photo. Of course this is being sold to the GOP in so far as they believe that the poorer citizens and immigrants, who traditionally vote democrat, are less prone to be able to prove their identity sufficiently to vote. Its a case of “If you can't win fair, win by making sure that the other guys constituents can't vote against you.”