It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Romania Breaking News-Innocent people sent to jail ,TV news channel almost shutted down

page: 6
23
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 12:23 PM
link   
I support criminals going to jail.
a reply to: PaulTheDuke




posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: abe froman

I am agree with you.but not this one and esspecialy not for a fake process.Thank you for sharing you opinions,have a nice day!
Peace!



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: PaulTheDuke
God Bless all in Romania, I know it's been hard on you guys for a long time. I hope you can get it all figured out, and if you do, let us in on the secret. Peace.






p.s. I know Voiculescu did some good things too, keeping a roof over people's heads is no small task.


edit on 13-8-2014 by abe froman because: ps



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 04:35 PM
link   
Someone here is starting to sound a bit off I think. The record's broken.

Stop bickering, if you really believe he's innocent, DO something about it. Until then, the judges have spoken: "Guilty as charged!". And that's the end of that.
Oh, actually no, it's the 1st step. The state will be in possession of the buildings in a couple of days. Let's see if the tv station can afford such a simple thing as paying a rent. It must be hard without all the blackmail money and offshore financing they got till now...

@abe froman I must commend you for seeing through all the manipulation. It's obvious there are lots of Romanians who can't do that. Justice has been served, and that's what matters the most. Especially in a country as corruption-ridden, thief-filled, manipulated by the media as Romania is.



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 05:32 PM
link   
a reply to: negue

It is going to sound harsh but you are taking as an absolute truth everything what the judges tells.If they are going to proove you that unicorns exists or that the Earth is flat,you are going to believe it.This also applies to this process.




1.He bought that field with the correct evaluation back then.Recently it has been highly overestimaed that field and now it is considered beeing bought illegaly.It is like you are going to buy an antique worth 500$ dollars and after years I will come at you,with an authencity file,that this antique is way too expensive and I request more moeny.

2.The accusation in which he telepathecaly influenced some people was a an accusation in order to not call them stupid just makes me feel sick and anyone who can judge a bit.

3.The court didn't respect the steps: the lawyers arguments and conclusions weren't considered in this process.

4.A prosecutor did a request before the process in which he tells that there is no proofs in this process,I mean that he didn't did for what he was judged..After the request,the prosecutor was arrested.


This are the main things that makes him innocent in this process.It is undeniable!
So if we talk about media moguls and their crimes.I want to remind you about Cristian Burci,the founder of some TV news channel who supports the President.He founded the first channel with money made FROM SELLING KIDS during the 90s,a short documentary made by CNN about this dirty bussiness,reveals him in that period and he talks about all the process that it takes in order to buy a kid.He was getting in between 3500-7500$ per child . He also has some cconnection with the biggest italian mafia ( don't remember it's name) . He is getting money from somewhere in order to sustain the financial support for his TV channels,because their audience is waaaay to low to support it.

Here it is the documentary,it is in a romanian site but you can watch it!
abefroman,if you want to watch (not even him) use online translation to get an idea about the written information,the video is translated in romanian from english,so this doesn't have to be a problem.

jurnalul.ro... america-675399.html

Also,this guy is protected by some security guards of our president (or something like that) i don't want to give a fake information,but he is protected.He also had a butchery a long time ago in which the dead animals were thrown into the river.

Voiculescu and Antena 3 was our president's clear target and you can't deny it. This guy I had talked about did this big atrocities,waaaay more harsh then what you said about Voiculescu.Yet this guy it's still free.

2 photos of this guy in the present
www.paginademedia.ro...
www.radardemedia.ro...

abefroman or anyone else will choose whose side to join *snip*,we have the freedom to choose and to express ourself in every way we want....unfortunately in Romania is not anymore,esspecialy in the media
It is up to you all

Peace!
edit on 13-8-2014 by PaulTheDuke because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-8-2014 by PaulTheDuke because: (no reason given)


 

Mod Edit: Please Review the Following Link: Courtesy Is Mandatory
edit on Wed Aug 13 2014 by Jbird because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 05:46 PM
link   
OMG, you exposed him, what am I ever going to do?

And what is the connection between the Voiculescu case (remember, the "innocent" you created this thread about), his blackmail-financed tv stations and all that text you wrote up there about someone else? If a criminal roams free, must all criminals regain their freedom? As I said before, justice has been served and your "star" is now doing time. Well-deserved time behind bars. Also, his off-shore financed blackmailing tv stations don't seem to fair so well, despite their assurances...

PS If you still believe a Romanian living in Romania had enough money saved up for creating tv stations in 1990, I have bad news for you...
edit on 13-8-2014 by negue because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: negue

I wrote about Cristian because i want to get more clear point about the fact that Antena 3 and Dan Voiculescu were the President's main target. Why doesn't the judges condemns Voiculescu for what he did in the commie period ? (if he did that) and not on this fake process?
Sending "criminals" in prison acusing them for false actions it's a bigger crime then killing.



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: negue




PS If you still believe a Romanian living in Romania had enough money saved up for creating tv stations in 1990, I have bad news for you...


I said one TV station and not stations,back then it was a future bussiness with a big profit.The money he got from the audience of that TV stations made him to make more of those.Enough money he had,from selling kids or as he was called a "baby broker" yes he could build a TV station.And from the money he got from that butchery,YES HE COULD!
edit on 13-8-2014 by PaulTheDuke because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 05:55 PM
link   
I figured it out, you're just being too much in love with the idea that this dude is innocent. Don't know why and I don't care anymore.

Couple of days ago I said you must show some credentials if you continue to claim he was wrongly accused and condemned. And you continued to. So... where's that law diploma that allows you to disagree with a judge's decision?



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 05:56 PM
link   
Let's keep the personal snipes/comments out of the discussion , Please.

Address the content of posts not the poster.




edit on Wed Aug 13 2014 by Jbird because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: negue

As long as an 16 years old kid humilating a "mature" person like you who supports the presidential mafia,I don't need any law diploma for that.It has 3th grade logic involved in this process that it can be easily debunked.It seems that you are running quite low on arguments.I would like to tell you that I am glad to hear your opinions about this all,I hope that you are going to be good where you are and maybe you will change your opinion about what is happening in Romania.

Peace!



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 06:14 PM
link   
Dude no, that's not how it works. You keep playing the "he was wrongly condemned and he's an innocent poor soul" record. I asked you to state your expertise so ATS members can see and judge for themselves if you're in the position to contest a judge's decision. So no, resorting to "it's so easy a 3rd grader could see it" does not help your cause.

The judge's decision was for a money launderer to do the time and to confiscate properties and accounts in order to recover the loss. A 60 million euros loss. Lawyers for the money launderer have used all legal, paralegal and sometimes even stretched the law to get their customer clean. They couldn't do it, they accepted their defeat and they now know it's over. That's it. Justice has been served.

PS You keep using foul language, although 2 super-moderators told you/us not to, you know that?
edit on 13-8-2014 by negue because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: negue

We are discussing opinions here,no need for expertise in order to convince the judge that they were false and this opinion has millions of Romanians and other huge part of the romanian public figures . And I am asking you again,DO YOU BELIEVE in everything in what a judge says,even if he tells you that unicorns exists or that the Earth is flat?




Lawyers for the money launderer have used all legal, paralegal and sometimes even stretched the law to get their customer clean.


You start spitting something harsh and fake.THOSE LAWYERS had their arguments ignored.I say again,a prosecutor before the process was arrested because he sent request to stop the process because there is no proof.This is justice ? Or sovietical justice ?



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 06:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: PaulTheDuke
[...]

You start spitting something harsh and fake

[...]


Now that you mentioned it, I have a bad cough. Looks like pneumonia to me.



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 06:33 PM
link   
a reply to: negue

I said it again,you are running low on arguments.Why don't we stop fighting,we remain with the idea that Voiculescu was sentenced for the wrong process,and a fake one too,and it had Antena 3 the main target.(again,maybe he laundered money during the commie period)
I have to remind you also that Antena 3 won an Emmy award last year and they are nominated to Emmy finals awards this year.So the idea you say that Antena 3 supports the sovietical or russian Ideas as you said,it goes down. (only TV news channel in Romania affiliated to CNN)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 06:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: PaulTheDuke
a reply to: negue

[...]
I have to remind you also that Antena 3 won an Emmy award last year and they are nominated to Emmy finals awards this year.So the idea you say that Antena 3 supports the sovietical or russian Ideas as you said,it goes down. (only TV news channel in Romania affiliated to CNN)


Dude, you keep posting nonsense and lies here. How can you imagine I'll agree with you?

Ah, so your favorite tv station got an Emmy last year? Wow, that's nice. Which Emmy did they get, and for what program, can you be more specific and provide us some links please?

Edit: still waiting for you to PROVE your claims. Also, you keep saying "affiliated with CNN" like it's a good thing

edit on 13-8-2014 by negue because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: negue

the award- www.antena3.ro...

the nominee this year - www.iemmys.tv...

I will ignore you from now.Let the ATS staff remove your off-topic subjects.
edit on 13-8-2014 by PaulTheDuke because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: PaulTheDuke
a reply to: negue

the award- www.antena3.ro...

the nominee this year - www.iemmys.tv...

I will ignore you from now.Let the ATS staff remove your off-topic subjects.


"My" off-topic posts. Yeah, right.

So we can chalk up one more lie for you. You said your tv station got an Emmy last year. Where is it? Kindly point it to us on the official Emmy site here: www.iemmys.tv... I looked and I don't see any "Antena 3" prizes on the official Emmy site. So you lied. Again. Gee, I wonder if there's actually anything you posted here that can be believed...



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 07:11 PM
link   
a reply to: negue

I wasn't so clear maybe about that prize,but they won an important prize.My single lie on this and this one is a little off-topic.At least i say that i lied,you aren't and you keep lying.



posted on Aug, 13 2014 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: PaulTheDuke
a reply to: negue

I wasn't so clear maybe about that prize,but they won an important prize.My single lie on this and this one is a little off-topic.At least i say that i lied,you aren't and you keep lying.


So you lied. And it's proven, with links and all. This can mean nothing you posted on this thread is to be believed, right?

Edit: You really think I lie? Prove it. I said you're a liar and I proved it. What do you have?
edit on 13-8-2014 by negue because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
23
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join