It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
good points, all of them.
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
It is illegal to film in and around prisons. That has been a long-standing law, because that is how escape attempts get planned. Now this place was just recently closed, but what are the plans for it? Will it will be reopened? Apparently it earned itself the nickname "Camp Walk Away" from the high number of breakouts. Guess that might be why the CO's are still edgy, even after it was just closed.
Who knows maybe they turned it into a blackops rendition site.
Going against my better judgement I'll respond once more. They were on a public road and not private property. The building was in clear and open view. The cops were not within their legal rights to demand confiscation of the film. You can write and read. Comprehension is the issue. Re-read the link for a better understanding of the laws and how they apply to this matter.
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
a reply to: Bilk22
Please look at bullet number 2 and bullet number 6 at your link.
For the entertainment of those who liked your post for some unknown reason, here is bullet number 2 from your link:
When you are on private property, the property owner may set rules about the taking of photographs. If you disobey the property owner's rules, they can order you off their property (and have you arrested for trespassing if you do not comply).
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
It is illegal to film in and around prisons. That has been a long-standing law, because that is how escape attempts get planned.
Health care, tourism, recreation or a casino are all feasible reuses for the Mount McGregor Correctional Facility property, after the prison closes in July, according to a recent Empire State Development Corp. report.
“The greatest unknown for repurposing this site is not the uses that the site can handle; it is the interest from the private market,” the report concludes.
There are “no land use feasibility issues” with any of those four types of uses, but maintaining a campus like setting would likely be necessary in order to reuse the existing buildings, because most of the buildings are connected with a steam tunnel heating system, the report stated.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: boncho
I am sure they never planned on getting the attention they are now getting!
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
It is under tight security because they are shooting a film there.
From your source:
With prisoners vacated, the only people on the grounds were a movie crew and corrections staff. Why the super secrecy?
originally posted by: EartOccupant
Just wondering,
Is it normal for guards to drive a Lexus?
Where I live (The Netherlands) a Lexus is a luxury car, in the high price range,
I find it curious that two guards show up in those expensive cars.
Or is that normal in America?
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: Bilk22
I don't believe it is the laws involved or freedom the press that Tarzan is disputing. What the issue here is the extent some of us have taken this issue.
Fema camps....alphabet agencies...immigrant detention? Give me a break!
A little research disputes all of that nonsense.
Tarzan was saying that some of you (not you) are flippen nuts and need to look for the facts before you jump to ridiculous conclusions.
Well he injected some of hisown conspiracy into it by suggesting the news crew could be some ruse -
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: Bilk22
I don't believe it is the laws involved or freedom the press that Tarzan is disputing. What the issue here is the extent some of us have taken this issue.
Fema camps....alphabet agencies...immigrant detention? Give me a break!
A little research disputes all of that nonsense.
Tarzan was saying that some of you (not you) are flippen nuts and need to look for the facts before you jump to ridiculous conclusions.
There are crazy people out there who can't wait to get their hands on celebrities. There are also crazy people out there who want an opportunity to kill certain people. There are also crazy people out there who just want to find a way to dance in front of any camera available. And crazy people do much worse things than these. However, legally the news crew was supposed to obtain permission from the Department of Corrections in order to be able to film any aspect of that prison. The reason should be clear for the technologically and the legally informed: It is entirely possible that News Channel 13's van was stolen. It is entirely possible that the crew are not the people, in reality, that they claim to represent. It should also be noted that the film crew inside the prison, regardless of what kind of film crew you think they were, had a right to the footage they were shooting/enacting/re-enacting.
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
a reply to: vonclod
They were allowed to film the cottage. Not the prison. That's the point.