posted on Aug, 12 2014 @ 02:32 AM
a reply to: wmd_2008
South Tower Collapse
really!!!...You can see from the videos that the collapses were symmetrical, it's ridiculous to argue they weren't..
KNOWN physics that tells us objects always fall to the path of least resistance. Using this common knowledge it's not hard to surmise that a
symmetrical collapse is not possible unless controlled....
now how does that tipping top, MAGICALLY stay centered ALL THE WAY DOWN to the bottom as the Bazzant theory states.....
WE SEE that upper mass shifted 22 degrees off center...HOW can it possibly impart an EQUAL force on the opposite side of the building when ALL it's
momentum force is toppling over to ONE side?
as we see it did, against ALL known physics.....no matter how long they took, we see they were one smooth collapse wave. There was no stopping and
starting of the collapses through laws of mechanics, conservation of momentum, transference of energy, Newtons 2nd, 3rd. law, known structural failure
behavior.....once initiated we see the collapses were non-stop, symmetrical, and complete.
WTC 7 DIDN'T fall straight down like you think.
during the GLOBAL UNIFIED interval of acceleration it DID.....the 2005 NIST saw it also and reported it.....they made an ENTIRE section of it....
NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completing
the global collapse"
do you understand what "ENTIRE"building means?????....the word, "GLOBAL"?......the term, 'single-unit'.....I suggest learning what these words mean
BEFORE your fingers run-a-muck here posting things your brain can't respond to.
edit on 12-8-2014 by biffcartright because: typo