It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Crakeur
the prevailing theory is that he died of an overdose. What Marianne Faithful is saying is that her boyfriend supplied the heroin and that he didn't mean for it to kill Jim. She's not implying that he accidentally killed him in some other manner.
originally posted by: MysterX
Not the point.
The dealer, her boyfriend at the time, was guilty of manslaughter.
She, having knowledge of this manslaughter, accidental or not, is guilty of withholding evidence of this crime, and is therefore an accessory to the crime of manslaughter.
As far as i know, there's no statute of limitations for such crimes...so yeah, she ought to be arrested and investigated to determine her guilt.
originally posted by: andy06shake
I would have thought knowing about a murder and not reporting it to be a crime in itself or an accessory to such? Especially so when the perpetrator is you heroin dealing partner.
The person 'Indulging' shouldn't be held accountable for their own actions?
originally posted by: DrunkYogi
Mars Bars are called Snickers now so i suppose it would be like Snickers in her Knickers.