It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
Gordon Brown started the world economic downturn? Who knew he had such power?
The problem with Brown (and pretty much every world finance minister) is that they only hear the lessons from Keynes they want to hear. The increased deficit during the downturn was absolutely the right thing to do and saved us from a much worse recession. Not cutting spending/increasing taxation when the going was good was the mistake.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Soloprotocol
Cameron has a Scottish surname.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: alldaylong
Does that make him Scottish?
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Soloprotocol
It always amazes me that so many on the no side are obsessed with nationality. They accuse the yes campaign of all the worse aspects of nationalism yet every reference I hear about being patriotic comes from better together and they obsesses about Blair being born in Scotland or that Cameron has a Scottish surname.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
Wouldn't surprise me at all. Would expect that most English people would be fairly uncommitted (no pun intended).
I don't see why people see London as shirt hand for England, although I appreciate some do and always try and use Westminster instead to be more specific.
A small number of Scots probably do blame the English fir their woes. Let me be very clear these people are generally morons and belong in the same category as English who blame French, Europe or elf'n'safety gone mad. Some people just like having someone to blame.
Blaming Westminster on the other hand is a political position, in my view perfectly legitimate although I am willing to hear alternatives.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
I think the issue is more the system at Westminster rather than the individuals (although there are some right gits). Unelected lords, corruption, overly powerfully party system. Not saying holyrood is perfect by any means but is more democratic and more local to needs of its electorate.
If we really did elect mps to represent local constituencies then parliament would work a lot better. As it is we elect them to represent a party and they are almost totally controlled by whips. (again a few honorable exceptions) .
Whitehall/ civil service is a good point. Never sure how I feel about the idea of a neutral civil service. Nice in principle but not really true. There is perhaps something to be said for a more American system of appointed advisors who at least are openly political.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
Sadly the debate in the lords is often far better than the commons. But still it is undemocratic relic.
Yes minister/prime minister remains not only the funniest but probably one of the most accurate portrayals of British politics ever.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: uncommitted
Gordon Brown started the world economic downturn? Who knew he had such power?
The problem with Brown (and pretty much every world finance minister) is that they only hear the lessons from Keynes they want to hear. The increased deficit during the downturn was absolutely the right thing to do and saved us from a much worse recession. Not cutting spending/increasing taxation when the going was good was the mistake.