It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Clairaudience
originally posted by: NavyDoc
Donors have been held liable for child support.
If that is true, that just leaves me speechless. Although there is no mention of this in the article you posted.
originally posted by: Biigs
They can have my splooge for a few quid, i dont mind.
Probably not the highest grade on the planet but if they want it, they can have it
originally posted by: boymonkey74
I would have donated if they made sure it was anonymous but it isn't.
So I do door to door for my services
.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: Biigs
Yup. I have already had the shock of finding out I have a teenage son and don't fancy another. .
originally posted by: NavyDoc
Sperm banks have seen a rapid decline in donors since anonymity was removed in 2005. Donors have been held liable for child support.
www.bbc.com...
I've always believed in the law of unintended consequences, that a law passed that may seem beneficial in the short run, has long term negative consequences. This is what we see in this case.
No wonder the UK has a shortage of sperm donors.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
I would have donated if they made sure it was anonymous but it isn't.
So I do door to door for my services
.
originally posted by: Clairaudience
originally posted by: NavyDoc
Donors have been held liable for child support.
If that is true, that just leaves me speechless. Although there is no mention of this in the article you posted.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: Biigs
Nah not cold just right.
I think iam to old now to donate (40) but I did hear that it is worth over a thousand bucks a ml.
Has anyone heard of any person getting done for child support after donating?.