It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: signalfire
a reply to: cardinalfan0596
We're talking a series of very small nukes, the size of baseballs,
cars in the area were reported to burst into flames as people tried to outrun the dust cloud (the engines, not the gas tanks, gamma radiation superheating the metal in the engines?)
if you look at some of the video at the time there's glitches in the recordings, many police and firemen reported that their radios went completely dead for several minutes
Prager's work is a marvel of scientific proof and reasoning,
The thermite crowd never explains the differential between how thermite looks when it's reacting, and how the towers looked...
and with tactical nukes now used routinely in war,
originally posted by: FinalCountdown
a reply to: CALGARIAN
I wish I had the billions required to rebuild the twin towers in a controlled environment.
Crash the same model planes into to same spots, using the same thrust, etc.
You could run this experiment 50 times on 50 different sets. I guarantee that the buildings would be damaged at their tops but still standing.
What a huge coordinated effort it must have been to rig these buildings with explosives prior to 9/11.
Inside job from every angle.
Have you yet noticed the continued trail of supposition and assumptions that get created in conspiracy theories?
Shyam Sunder at NIST technical briefing
"the phenomenon that we saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building down was really thermal expansion, which occurs at lower temperatures."
[NCSTAR1A-3.2]"It is likely that much of the burning took place beyond the views of the windows"