posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 08:36 PM
a reply to: soficrow
Sorry for the delay, thanks for the reply.
It's an epidemic, I insist - they're only calling it an "outbreak" for damage control.
Up until now all the other incidences of Ebola have been called "micro-breaks". The fact they are calling it an "outbreak" (even in the CDC) is
remarkable in and of itself.
Next is Pandemic in the chain. And in retrospect, a Plague.
Bit I'm with you, this is the worst incidence of Ebola ever. If we're not careful, the world is going to pussy foot around with it until its to
Dunno about terror(ism). I will say this. The siege measures to subjugate a people in modern times is to disrupt the infrastructure by turning off
power, water, sewage and interrupting transport of goods, food and medical supplies. These effects are the usual result of "bombing campaigns".
See Gaza, Eastern Ukraine, etc. The intent is to turn off water to wash with and flood the streets with raw sewage (people can't flush if the water is
off) and that is intended to start plagues like cholera and typhoid on purpose
So considering that Ebola deaths are minor in comparison to war and sieges to conquer nations, the powers that be don't really give a s*** about a few
or even a million Ebola deaths in some backwater country.
Maybe Ebola was not started on purpose but but will be allowed to run its course?
Like a forest department controlled burn in a forest to reduce undergrowth, it is a double edged sword that could get out of hand.
Did you hear they are going to be maybe bringing infected people into the US? The last thing you want is the jump of Ebola from one continent to
another by mistake but now they are intending to do that on purpose
someone kick me.
edit on 31-7-2014 by intrptr because: bb code and change