It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Except for how much money Assange is making off wikileak leaks for his personal use.
originally posted by: Illuminawty
a reply to: Xcathdra
Except for how much money Assange is making off wikileak leaks for his personal use.
What's wrong with him exploiting the government for money? They do it to us on a daily basis. I applaud him for that as well.. Get rich...at least one of us will be able to make a profit from the government as opposed to them promising us everything and than stealing in return. Democrats and Republican's ...you both sVck!
originally posted by: TheJourney
So, what is the 'unprecedented' news..
It basically revealed nothing, no?
originally posted by: Destinyone
I only have one questions. Does this make all of us posting in this thread guilty of breaking a multi-government gag order.
If so...does anybody really care.
Des
originally posted by: jhn7537
Damn... I guess I will ask the stupid question here..
Can someone please explain the significance of this wikileaks release in Jhn7537 terms, I mean Layman's terms?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: jhn7537
Damn... I guess I will ask the stupid question here..
Can someone please explain the significance of this wikileaks release in Jhn7537 terms, I mean Layman's terms?
Apparently the nations listed have nationals/citizens that engaged in corruption.
The Australian Court issued a gag order, barring any Australian media from reporting on any part of the incident.
The insinuation is the governments were trying to cover up the corruption by gagging the media from knowing about / reporting on it.
Thats what I got out of it.
Australian courts have increasingly been issuing suppression orders preventing the publication of legal proceedings – and an implicit dislike of the media is partly to blame
Last month, an Australian judge issued a super-duper injunction preventing the reporting of bribery allegations which involved south east Asian political figures, and in some cases their family members.
The allegations have arisen in a criminal case before the supreme court of Victoria. The super-injunction, which not only prevents publication of the allegations, but the detailed terms of the injunction itself, only came to light because WikiLeaks published the intimate details on July 29.
So while WikiLeaks, anonymous blogs and social media are buzzing with the details of these sweeping court orders, which apply Australia-wide, the mainstream media cannot trespass in this territory for fear of facing proceedings for contempt of court. This is the ludicrous nature of overreaching suppression orders, and this one is to last for five years unless earlier revoked.