posted on Jul, 29 2014 @ 06:28 PM
originally posted by: Xcathdra
and rebel sources stated on social media they had BUK's and shot the aircraft down.
Total crap. You know it. The social media posting was made by a person unrelated to any anti-Kiev organization or unit. Are you responsible for fake
postings made by other people purporting to be you? No. Get over it.
Secondly the SU 27 does not fit into the umpteenth theory Russia has put forward, where they identified the aircraft as an SU 25. I guess its
possible Russia could change their evidence over to SU 27 since the SU 25 is not capable of doing whats being claimed, let alone causing the damage
with the air to air missiles it carries.
The Russian press conference at which this was discussed merely suggested that the aircraft could "possibly" be SU25. There was and has not ever been
any assertion as to the type of fighter aircraft tracked in the vicinity of MH17 on radar. You sound like a petulant child.
The op source is interesting. If people research the name of the person who wrote the article you will find over 300 articles that are less
than west friendly while making claims that are supported by make believe.
LOL. Whatever. Now you are showing your utter disrespect for people with views contrary to your own. IMHO, good on any person who can see the world in
a way that differs from the official US government one, such as the State Department.
Props to the op for trying to bury the source under a link that appears legitimate.
Anderwelt Online - Peter Haisenko bio
Link is German so you will need a translator program.
Enough said. Why is this link not legitimate? Do you know something the rest of us do not? I imagine you think you do. ##SNIPPED##
This thread was very good in raising the issue of Ukrainian fighters shooting down MH17. I suggest if you don't like the subject matter, be a bit more
constructive in posting to it. Or just keep lips shut.
Edit: Oh yes, here is a link to some of the "bullets" the German expert was on about:
edit on 29-7-2014 by Blister because: (no