It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The word translated here as "saved" is in the Greek, sózó, which is in this verse in the Perfect, Passive, Participle, Nominative, Plural form.
Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Gift, free gift. A gift is a gift. A gift is free.
Which in practical terms would be by being baptized, which is the recognized and prescribed step to enter the church.
A person could stand here with a gift for me all day, but if I don't reach out and take it.....
The way that you describe it, it wouldn't.
I've noticed that you're quite the fan of saying "this doesn't really mean this" and "that doesn't really mean that"
"Well, if you take it back to the Greek..."
This implies that not just anyone can read the Word of God and understand the Gospel if they just believe what the words say. How does that make sense?
They meant what they meant by the person originally writing it, which was a long time ago and in a language other than English.
Words mean what they mean, and I trust that God has the power to preserve his Word.
Go ahead and cite them for us, and I would be happy to explain them for you.
I can provide multiple, clear statement scriptures that say "believe, believe, believe"
You can look at the exact same thing that I am looking at, so it isn't anything secret, plus we have DISRAELI here on this forum that knows Greek better than I do, who could totally bust me if I was lying about it.
You can only tell us to take it back to a language that was spoken 2000 years ago and we're to just take your word for it, that what you're saying is right.
People are not saved by correct theology, so they are not necessarily condemned to hell for not having a good translation.
How about those people between say.. the late 1500's till now, who didn't have a Greek interlinear to go by? They're just S.O.L.?
originally posted by: jmdewey60
People are not saved by correct theology, so they are not necessarily condemned to hell for not having a good translation.
You're aiming to convince everyone here that the plain statements of the scripture are wrong, and that we need to learn some foreign language to understand the Bible.
This "translation to end all translations" (for a while at least) was the result of the combined effort of about fifty scholars. They took into consideration: The Tyndale New Testament, The Coverdale Bible, The Matthews Bible, The Great Bible, The Geneva Bible, and even the Rheims New Testament. The great revision of the Bishop's Bible had begun. From 1605 to 1606 the scholars engaged in private research. From 1607 to 1609 the work was assembled. In 1610 the work went to press, and in 1611 the first of the huge (16 inch tall) pulpit folios known today as "The 1611 King James Bible"
Seventh Day Adventist, who are traditionally supporters of righteousness according to God's law, living a life without sin. Some members have been infected by Free Grace cult beliefs so kind of poo-poo the idea of perfection. I was sucked into this sort of Reformation revisionism back in the Seventies, but luckily got fee of those errors by just plain studying of the Bible.
You're of the Latter Day Saints denomination, correct? I seem to remember you saying that somewhere
This is Paul using rhetoric.
Romans 4:5
But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.
It's the preserved, inspired Word of God.
"Textus Receptus" was a sales gimmick by a book printer.
The 1611 KJV was translated from the Textus Receptus and few of the other early English translations . . .
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: Rex282If that was the case, then don't you think it is odd that the Bible doesn't mention it?
The FACT is the creator God WILL save/deliver ALL OF MANKIND from "hades"…
originally posted by: graphuto
Yes, you're saved by grace. Through faith.
originally posted by: graphuto
Salvation is the free gift of God, but you have to accept the gift. You must open it!
originally posted by: graphuto
If what you say is true, there would be no need for the Bible and Jesus and the Word of God.
Does it say "but he that is not baptized shall be damned"? Or "but he that is baptized not, nor believeth, shall be damned" ?
No. It says "but he that believeth not shall be damned."
The book, Romans, was written to the Christians in Rome, in general.
The entire chapter of Romans 7 speaks to how we are released from the law and bound to Christ. Some would say that he was speaking to the Jews, but the book of Romans was written to the Gentiles in Rome.
"Saved" in the Old Testament meant being in the congregation, where sinners were kicked out.
The Jews were NEVER saved by keeping the law, they were saved in the same manner that the NT Church is saved, by grace through faith.
Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
One that believes that salvation is by works, and another who believes that salvation is by faith.
I don't see a third, unspoken statement there, nor do I believe that there is one intended…
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. (Mark 16:16 NIV)