posted on Jul, 26 2014 @ 03:26 PM
a reply to: alldaylong
Something seems to be wrong with my internet connection, you're coming through garbled.
Well, you can start with The U.N.
Note:- The source of this article is not The U.N. but the illegal squatters themselves.
OK, fine, the source of the article is illegal squatters. The UN isn't an illegal squatter, I don't think anybody believes icahd is made up of
illegal squatters. So who is the source of the article? I'm shaking my head, but I have a feeling that it doesn't matter who was the source of the
But in that case, your "Note" leaves me baffled. If this is important, try explaining it again. If it's not, let it go.
I understand that the charge is illegal squatting. It may be true. I haven't read enough about the legalities of it, and I would wager that it
doesn't matter to anyone out there except as a PR tool.
How many times has it been shouted from the rooftops, on ATS or anywhere else, that the rockets Hamas are using are in violation of international law,
including the Geneva convention?
See? The settlements, are only brought out to make a political point. Interestingly, no one seems to want to make a similar uproar over Hamas'
violations of the laws of war. I suppose that's because that would make a point for the "wrong" side.
But, I wonder, are we drifting from disrespectful tweets, to re-fighting the age old ATS "Arab - Israeli" battle?
edit on 26-7-2014 by charles1952 because: spelling