It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: demus
originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
originally posted by: demus
a reply to: ProfessorChaos
in USA, how do you deal with trespassers let alone forceful occupation of a home?
How I defend my personal home has nothing to do with how the government defends its citizens.
On that same note: How is Israel wrong in defending itself from rocket fire from within Gaza?
so you agree that Palestinians have right to defend against occupation, forceful relocation and illegal confiscation of their land?
originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
originally posted by: demus
originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
originally posted by: demus
a reply to: ProfessorChaos
in USA, how do you deal with trespassers let alone forceful occupation of a home?
How I defend my personal home has nothing to do with how the government defends its citizens.
On that same note: How is Israel wrong in defending itself from rocket fire from within Gaza?
so you agree that Palestinians have right to defend against occupation, forceful relocation and illegal confiscation of their land?
What exactly makes Israeli occupation of the land "illegal"?
Israel currently has 163 Jewish-only settlements and 99 "outposts" built on confiscated Palestinian land.
there are 163 official Israeli settlements and 99 informal outposts on Palestinian land, including 24 neighborhoods in East Jerusalem de facto annexed to Israel (a total of 262 settlements). APN's interactive settlement map shows the name, location, and population for each settlement and outpost on Palestinian territory, all of which are considered illegal under international law.
originally posted by: demus
a reply to: HumansEh
maybe for you personally the image presented in the tweet is not disrespectful but to completely ignore that it is disrespectful for a group that it is aimed to and say that it's only a warning and continue with anti - Muslim narrative...
I don't know, how should we call that*?
originally posted by: demus
originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
originally posted by: demus
a reply to: ProfessorChaos
in USA, how do you deal with trespassers let alone forceful occupation of a home?
How I defend my personal home has nothing to do with how the government defends its citizens.
On that same note: How is Israel wrong in defending itself from rocket fire from within Gaza?
so you agree that Palestinians have right to defend against occupation, forceful relocation and illegal confiscation of their land?
Resolution 446 (1979): 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
Resolution 452: " ... 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories".
Resolution 465: " ... 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel's settlements program".
originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
originally posted by: demus
originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
originally posted by: demus
a reply to: ProfessorChaos
in USA, how do you deal with trespassers let alone forceful occupation of a home?
How I defend my personal home has nothing to do with how the government defends its citizens.
On that same note: How is Israel wrong in defending itself from rocket fire from within Gaza?
so you agree that Palestinians have right to defend against occupation, forceful relocation and illegal confiscation of their land?
What exactly makes Israeli occupation of the land "illegal"?
maybe for you personally the image presented in the tweet is not disrespectful but to completely ignore that it is disrespectful for a group that it is aimed to and say that it's only a warning and continue with anti - Muslim narrative...
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: demus
maybe for you personally the image presented in the tweet is not disrespectful but to completely ignore that it is disrespectful for a group that it is aimed to and say that it's only a warning and continue with anti - Muslim narrative...
You're upset that a representative of a country being attacked by Hamas..., with rockets and tunnels which have been used to infiltrate terrorists, is being disrespectful? I'm not going to repeat my earlier post.
But they should be disrespectful.
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: demus
I'd wager that Britain was very disrespectful to the Germans during the Battle of Britain.
The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) is a human rights and peace organization established in 1997 to end Israel’s Occupation over the Palestinians.
originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: alldaylong
Dear alldaylong,
You seem to believe that the source of the article is important. Calling the source "illegal squatters." The first sentence of their Vision and Mission statement is:
The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) is a human rights and peace organization established in 1997 to end Israel’s Occupation over the Palestinians.
I hardly think they're illegal squatters, do you?
With respect,
Charles1952