It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Investigators obtain ObamaCare coverage, subsidies using fake identities

page: 2
10
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

reminds me of a Mark Dice operation


It sure does have all the ingredients of a farce, were it not for the citizens who are lighting up the proverbial cigarette after feeling royally um...




posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:14 PM
link   
Remember who has been hired to sign up these people. Check out the volunteer organizations they used and are using to get people's information, I mean, signed up.

Remember this article:

Felons could have been hired



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:20 PM
link   
I don't like the ACA, feel it just put more money into the hands of insurance companies.
I did like the idea of what they tried to implement, it was just done horribly.
But what is the point of this? To show that you can lie and cheat the goverment?
Congrats, just proved something everyone already knew.
But of course this is the obama admins fault that some one went out of their way to prove a point that everyone already knows is possible.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: NonsensicalUserName
a reply to: xuenchen

lol, this is the next "scandal" on the line, we'll see Darrel "the arsonist" Issa, waste everyone's time and dime, again...

That's why de-funding Obamacare is the sensible approach rather than taking months to go thru Obama stonewalls...
Thanks for reminding us the correct way...

edit on 23-7-2014 by Granite because: sp



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I really don't know why anyone would be surprised by this, during congressional testimony several security eggheads said the website security was nonexistent. They ran test after test and they all failed and failed badly. Before the shooting starts I did IT work for sometime so I sorta fall into the egghead dept. on this. So I am NOT picking on eggheads. Only the Federal government could spend a billion dollars and achieve a fornicated nonfunctioning insecure website.

And its still that way after how long now? Since Oct 2013. The law says operational and certified by Jan i 2014. Fat chance of that maybe ever. These are the people you will ultimately trust your life to. Smaaaaart.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

You are only shelling out that money when and if income taxes are filed, as tax credits. If they don't file, fictitious people don't file taxes, you're off the hook! However, the insurance premium is still paid for.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: jimmyx




have them arrested and thrown in jail, it would set a good example.


I would rather have ACA defenders arrested, and thrown in jail for supporting the current administration who DEFRAUDED the public.

That would set a good example.

Accessories after the fact.


So you want peoples free speech to cause them to go to jail?
Good to know neo.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: neo96

You are only shelling out that money when and if income taxes are filed, as tax credits. If they don't file, fictitious people don't file taxes, you're off the hook! However, the insurance premium is still paid for.





See the problem there is the people who will be on Obamacare weren't paying income tax to begin with.

As it was suppose to specifically target the so called 'poor'.

Which if they could get insurance they would have already had it.

But THEY DID ALREADY have it since that thing called medicaid exists.

That was SPECIFICALLY created for the poor.

The ACA was not needed.

And if people were getting denied healthcare ?

The US Government was doing it.
edit on 23-7-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

That aint got jacksnip to do with free speech.

The act of fraud is ILLEGAL - Those who gave us the ACA.

Those who willfully supported that are accessories.

Because those who aid, and abet in the breaking of the law ?

Are guilty.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Granite

gr8 b8 m8

a reply to: neo96
neo, relax and stop being so hysterical; frankly your should go to prison with them for your support of ignoring due-process.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Well, I'm pretty poor, and I pay a monthly premium. But, at any rate, the article said that these fraudsters paid for their policies.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

You said you'd want the defender's of the aca to be jailed.
They have every right to defend what they think was right. And you want them jailed.
That is jailing some one for free speech, how do you see it different.
Unless you want to the people that helped create the bill jailed, then I would almost agree with you.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: NonsensicalUserName



"Due Process" is out the window me thinks.

How can the courts operate efficiently when the laws themselves are being routed hollow and the blanks filled in with EOs, Memos, and administrative directives.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:40 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Doesn't matter what you think, due process is still alive and kicking.
Do you want to get rid of it?



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80




They have every right to defend what they think was right.


Forcing people to buy a corporate product(healthcare)

Was not even close to being 'right'.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: xuenchen

Doesn't matter what you think, due process is still alive and kicking.
Do you want to get rid of it?


Obama is doing a great job of "getting rid" of many things isn't he.

But following the laws would help the system don't you think ?

How is side-stepping and selectively by-passing "helping" anything at all ?

Don't you think the existing "Legal" immigration program is good enough ?

Why are all the changes necessary anyway ?




posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Lol so its obamas fault people can cheat and apply for obamacare, good to know, keep up the great work. cough cough



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Sremmos80




They have every right to defend what they think was right.


Forcing people to buy a corporate product(healthcare)

Was not even close to being 'right'.



But people have the right to think that it was right neo. And they can not be jailed for such thoughts. That is literally the point of the first and you know it.
I agree tho, forcing people to buy a corporate product was not right, sure it did give a small percentage of people help but it screwed over more.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:51 PM
link   
Does the right remember who wrote romneycare, there good old boys at the heritage fund did, cough cough obama



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

No the current immigration program is horrible.... If you want more legal immigrants then start making some what is congress doing threads.
And just so we are clear, obama has not gotten rid of due process right?
Or would you like him to do so?



new topics




 
10
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join