posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 11:02 PM
a reply to: Sparkymedic
There is a large influx of people here who have new accounts that only post on Russian related issues that aren't interested in facts. So when you say
I have taken sides, you'd be correct. I side with the truth, and the evidence
, wherever that leads. I can't say the same for others in this
debate, and all the data indicates the rebels are not being honest, nor are the Russians (including the recent influx of Russian posters as of late
that was recently provided by SkepticOverlord in another thread):
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
a reply to: whitepanther999
Sorry to poke a sharp stick at your bubble, but you've joined only two days ago, and your activity has been nothing but apologizing for Putin on MH17
related threads from day one.
Do you have supporting links that are not from Russian sponsored propaganda sites? I've noticed that many of your posts contain claims without proper
citation, attribution, or support of any kind.
Edit to add:
We've had a good spike in site traffic since this tragedy began, which is typical of such world events in the past. However, after a cursory look at
the details, about 60% of the overall spike is from Russian Internet providers… this disproportionate spike from one region is exceptionally
atypical. Additionally, nearly 25% of that Russian traffic are logged-in as members; our typical ratio is only 8% of all traffic being logged-in as
members. We saw a similar overall spike when Russia invaded Ukraine, but didn't see these disproportionate regional spikes, or increase in members
This is a very strong indication that AboveTopSecret.com is the target of a concerted effort to disrupt or otherwise shape the nature of these
So while you claim you are unbiased, I don't feel you can make that claim honestly when you are siding with people who are dismissing evidence
outright. Mountains of it. Admissions of it even. How can you be unbiased when you haven't even taken a neutral position?
While all the Russian apologists cry for "TRUE evidence", can any of them provide TRUE EVIDENCE that it was anyone other than the rebels that shot
down that plane? Can you?
edit on 23-7-2014 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)