posted on Jul, 22 2014 @ 01:15 AM
a reply to: ParasuvO
I would hope that the bulk of us being critical thinkers and conspiracy fact aware would know about secondary and tertiary fail-safe plans in
propaganda wars. Just in case you don't, it's when you have a C & B plan to keep everything away from A, the truth of what actually happened. This
is/can be applied to any critical situation and provides a secondary diversion or outlet. The 9/11 commission is a tertiary type C plan, which
explains the situation concerning 9/11 as something that isn't possible and that just might be swallowed by 85% of an apathetic population, but should
hold people off long enough to get whatever has to be done in place, in this case NDAA, TSA, DHS, etc.
This alleged 28 page document is the secondary (B) plan, to be used should the C plan fail, but only under pressure. The object of a B plan is to make
people believe that the information contained therein is SO damaging that a government HAS to protect it and thereby, when it comes out, everyone will
believe it without questioning the veracity of any fraudulent evidence, claims or twists and turns. The B plan therefore continues to steer people
away from the truth, because the truth would ultimately cause the government to fail, probably through revolution.
In the case for 9/11 if the B plan states that the Saudi's did it, the government will be able to rally support to overthrow Saudi Arabia and take
over the oil fields. The impetus will be there because the American people will not question a document so heavily and completely guarded and it will
provide the reasons to attack. I expect the B plan will be blamed on whichever Bush is dead when it comes out, to limit the potential for internal
retaliation against the US government.
It's a pretty standard plan and really it's just a clever way of thinking two moves ahead and manipulating the information.
Cheers - Dave
edit on 7/22.2014 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)