It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: rustyclutch
I find it funny that when people believe in the western intel we get crapped on but when the ussr "facts" come out everyone is to except it as truth.
Around and Around we go.
Except the west hasn't produced any "intel".
US Mil might have some evidence of what happened.
Here's an interesting article written by Dutch satellite tracker:
originally posted by: TDawgRex
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: rustyclutch
I find it funny that when people believe in the western intel we get crapped on but when the ussr "facts" come out everyone is to except it as truth.
Around and Around we go.
Except the west hasn't produced any "intel".
And Russia has?!
That's flippin' hilarious. you should get a comedy show.
originally posted by: TDawgRex
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: rustyclutch
I find it funny that when people believe in the western intel we get crapped on but when the ussr "facts" come out everyone is to except it as truth.
Around and Around we go.
Except the west hasn't produced any "intel".
And Russia has?!
That's flippin' hilarious. you should get a comedy show.
originally posted by: rustyclutch
Yeah well you guys keep buying the American story. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting on that evidence though. If they had it they would have produced it already. They knew who did it while the plane was still burning. Surely they could have presented SOME sort of evidence to us.
Just a question. How far in advance do you have to know about something to have your satellite over the area at the time? For about a half hour an American satellite was right over eastern Ukraine. Another tidbit of information some of you are ignoring. If they had evidence it would be all over the t.v. They don't. A cut together audio, a video of a BUK system in territory that KIEV controls, not the rebels, and a lot of accusations. Washington had a satellite there at the time....where is the imagery? What, we don't get to see the pictures because they don't want us to know how good their satellites are?
I'm still waiting on some of you to present facts contradicting any of the article. Oh thats right, you don't have any, neither does Washington. What Washington DOES have is clear satellite footage of what happened. A play by play. And we will never see it.
There was an KLM flight behind the MH17... they pulled away after the shot douwn...
still no mention wat those pilots have seen ...weird !
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: TDawgRex
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: rustyclutch
I find it funny that when people believe in the western intel we get crapped on but when the ussr "facts" come out everyone is to except it as truth.
Around and Around we go.
Except the west hasn't produced any "intel".
And Russia has?!
That's flippin' hilarious. you should get a comedy show.
A lot more than the west has laughing boy.
originally posted by: manna2
Arent you assuming, for some reason, that both planes started from the same starting line? Like you are implying it is a race of sorts? Doesnt the radar show the su in front of mh17?a reply to: buddah6
originally posted by: rustyclutch
originally posted by: TDawgRex
originally posted by: rustyclutch
a reply to: ANNED
Sounds like you are mad at the evidence bro. It never says the plane was shot down by an SU-25. It says at a point in time right before the crash that a su-25 and the 777 were 3-5 km apart. Ukraine denied having aircraft in the area period PUBLICLY. Like I said. I'm of the idea that they knew the rebels had one buk missile set they captured maybe and they shot the airliner down to pin it on them. At least my opinion is based in some type of fact. To believe the American side of the story is like believing in Santa Claus. There is no proof like there is no Santa.
then by your own statement and the pro-Russian rebels did fire a shot at what they thought was one target, but hit another...they're guilt free?
The separatists and the Russian Gov't are spinning like no tomorrow. I think they took a page out of the 0bama playbook.
Where do you see me saying the rebels fired a shot mistakenly? A thread from 3 days ago. I sure as hell haven't said it in the past 48 hours. Try to stay on topic. Or at least try to not put words in my mouth.
And yes, I'm still laughing at your attempt.
originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: TDawgRex dude can ya seriously not smell a rat in the american and ukraine story,please look at this whole issue again taking into account the new banking system and the vast resources russia mantains
originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: TDawgRex dude can ya seriously not smell a rat in the american and ukraine story,please look at this whole issue again taking into account the new banking system and the vast resources russia mantains
originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: TDawgRex
And yes, I'm still laughing at your attempt.
Well, that could be an effect of the meds, and anyway I was referring to the comparison of Russian intel to Western intel, when, in fact, the West has failed to produce any...Regardless of the veracity of the Russian information....does that clear things up?
originally posted by: TDawgRex
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: TDawgRex
originally posted by: Flatcoat
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: rustyclutch
I find it funny that when people believe in the western intel we get crapped on but when the ussr "facts" come out everyone is to except it as truth.
Around and Around we go.
Except the west hasn't produced any "intel".
And Russia has?!
That's flippin' hilarious. you should get a comedy show.
A lot more than the west has laughing boy.
Links? Other than RT propaganda, or FOXNews or MSNBC or BBC.
I'm looking for proof of who is guilty, I don't base this upon some emotion....Prove your case with facts, not emotion.
And yes, I'm still laughing at your attempt.