It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: Char-Lee
Indeed it was a strangle. A completely legal strangle hold! I already stated that... My point is that a strangle hold to subdue someone, then putting weight on their head is quite effective, safe, and well practiced as a method to gain control of another person.
As for the number of cops that arrived, how is that relevant to brutality??
This isn't a case of brutality, I would be that one man who hung the jury.
originally posted by: Hellas
St 6:20 you can see the guy laughing in the background and at 7:40 he's even waving to the cam..
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: Char-Lee
Indeed it was a strangle. A completely legal strangle hold! I already stated that... My point is that a strangle hold to subdue someone, then putting weight on their head is quite effective, safe, and well practiced as a method to gain control of another person.
As for the number of cops that arrived, how is that relevant to brutality??
This isn't a case of brutality, I would be that one man who hung the jury.
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: alienjuggalo
I don't assume that the cop putting the choke hold on the person wanted him dead.
originally posted by: criticalhit
a reply to: Kromlech
The real bottom line is that most of what police do is not the reason we have police.
This guy was hawking cheap cigarettes? How does stopping that fall under the banner of "protect and serve" who are they working for the Fed, Tobacco Companies, IRS... I don't even know.
The definition of criminal has become way too loose, be out there, to top murderers and thief's, rapists and molester's the rest of this stuff is way too gray
originally posted by: Aazadan
It's illegal to sell untaxed cigarettes.
originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: alienjuggalo
This is not a case of police brutality! The officer never slammed his head into the ground, and didn't even keep him in the hold for long, just long enough to bring the man down. This is just a tragic death. Although 9 times out of 10 I agree with the OPs in this forum, this time I cannot. That officer followed sound procedures throughout the arrest. A head lock to bring someone down, then pinning their head to the ground is quite effective and normally safe. It is widely taught in self defense and in martial arts. Control their head and you control their body.
Arrest that cop for murder!
No, at best it would be involuntary man-slaughter.
Where are the tazers?!
Good one, use a tazer, then when ever someone dies from use of a tazer everyone gets all uppity and demands justice.
S*** happens...s*** just happens sometimes.
People need to remember that instead of yelling brutality in cases such as this. Save all the cackling for true police brutality cases, like the horrific ones that seem to be pouring in more and more frequently.
At the center of the inquiry is the officer’s use of a chokehold — a dangerous maneuver that was banned by the New York Police Department more than 20 years ago but that the department cannot seem to be rid of.
“As defined in the department’s patrol guide, this would appear to have been a chokehold,” the police commissioner, William J. Bratton, said at a news conference in City Hall on Friday afternoon.
He referred to police rules that forbid chokeholds and define them as including “any pressure to the throat or windpipe, which may prevent or hinder breathing or reduce intake of air.”