It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And why is the fairfax media defending her? stupid question- The Liberals and the printed media scratch each others backs.
Would it be asking too much to get something other than a link and two words?
The editorial page of Monday's Global Times - the Chinese Communist Party's rabidly nationalistic tabloid - would seem to support Hugh White's prediction that Australia will pay a price for obstructing, rather than facilitating, the expansion of Chinese "leadership" in the region.
The paper derided Julie Bishop as a "complete fool" using a term that defies neat translation but could be construed even more harshly.
The personal attack raised eyebrows in the diplomatic corps in Australia and abroad, where Ms Bishop is widely considered to be the most competent Australian foreign affairs minister since Gareth Evans.
Read more: www.smh.com.au... H7
'm not telling you to NOT post about it. It's about the general ATS rules and expectations. For starters, one liners are really frowned upon (in general). So that 2 word post was pretty dodgy. But on top of that when you link to a website about an article as such you would be better of starting by quoting something from it like this;
You can't quote the entire article, and should be approx 10% or less and contain the source link (you did that bit fine). But most importantly we all wan't to hear what your views on the topic are. What do you think of Julie Bishops standing? Is China in the right to be critical? etc. Put something down in your own words to engage in starting the conversation.