It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Xcathdra
And? What does that have to do with what we are discussing? He hasn't even had one trial yet, let alone two or three.
As we note on our home page, at a court martial everyone assumes the defendant is guilty. You have probably heard that someone accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty. That’s only true in a strictly legal sense. But in terms of how people really think, once you’re accused of committing a crime, you can forget about the presumption of innocence. At a court martial the judge, the jury, the prosecutors, the commanders, the members of the defendant’s unit – everyone thinks the defendant did it, or else he wouldn’t be sitting there. It takes an aggressive, experienced military court martial attorney to overcome all of that.
From the beginning of the case, the court martial defendant faces huge disadvantages. The government has unlimited resources at a court martial, but the appointed defense counsel’s office receives very little funding. The government will have at least two prosecutors at a court martial, while the defendant is typically entitled to have only one appointed attorney. The prosecution has an entire office of investigators, but the defense is entitled to none. The prosecution can afford to travel have any witness it wants to the court martial testify against the defendant, but the defense needs to get the government’s approval to fund any defense witness travel. The prosecution gets to use just about any expert witness it chooses, but the defense has to get the government’s approval to pay for any of the defense experts, and typically the government denies defense requests for specific experts. During the court martial, the defendant’s commander might pack the courtroom with members of the defendant’s unit, so that the command can send a message. If the defendant gets convicted, the appellate military courts will be very reluctant to undo the court martial results. In every sense, the odds are stacked against the court martial defendant.
The prosecution uses those long odds to intimidate the defendant into taking a deal that he shouldn’t take. The prosecutors get to choose what crimes to charge the defendant with at a court martial, and they’re usually creative about it. This usually means that they will take an “everything but the kitchen sink” approach and charge the defendant with more crimes than they can hope to prove if the defendant chooses to fight the court martial. Many times, the prosecution simply charges the defendant with the same conduct but under several different crimes. This makes his potential punishment at court martial much greater, and the goal is to make the court martial defendant afraid of getting destroyed if he fights – even though his chances are always better if he pleads not guilty and fights the case.
When you’re facing a court martial, you need a strong military attorney who isn’t intimidated by the long odds, the prosecutors, or the investigators. You need a military attorney who has done more trials by court martial than he can count, who knows how to talk to a jury, and who knows how to catch the government when it’s not playing fair. You need a military attorney who has been successful getting good experts appointed to help the defense. Most importantly, you need a military attorney who doesn’t owe the military anything and isn’t afraid that it will threaten his military career if he fights his hardest for the defendant.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Krazysh0t
So Major Hassan was considered innocent as well. La-di-dah. Tell that to those who survived at Fort Hood.
I have my opinion on the matter. Sorry, my heart isn't "bleeding" for this jerk.
originally posted by: beezzer
Gotta go. I won't apologise for having an opinion in the matter.
As for the 6th? Stop being hyperbolic!
This is just what I was talking about before. I refuse to get the "herds" approval for providing an opinion.
Agree or disagree. I don't care.
It's my damned opinion!
originally posted by: milomilo
people forgot that in vietnam there were deserter who seek asylum in North vietnam. many of them never got punished by US goverment.
i think those vietnamese deserters just dont want to fight in illegal war and since they are forced to enlist against their will they seek safety in their enemy.
bowe bergdahl motivation to join army was patriotic but naive. the modern US army are filled with cruel and evil people, so much so that bergdahl cant stand it anymore. he got disillusioned and dont want any part of it anymore. so he in clear conscience leave the post and carry nothing that can be used by the enemy. This should be a positive point for bowe
He just want peace, let him return to his loving parents and live peacefully
originally posted by: 200Plus
a reply to: milomilo
LoL - the Army is full of crazy evil people. Yea that's true. You nailed it with 100% accuracy. Congrats.
I too wish nothing but peace and rest for PVT Bergdhal. Someday may he finally find the place that allows him to be able to find both so that he can at last rest in peace.
Seriously though he is facing a Court Martial trial. That tells me three things:
1 - He willing left his post
2 - He is being charged with desertion rather than being AWOL (AWOL would be non-judicial under Art-15)
3 - The Army feels that they have enough to bring a case against him
I have seen hundreds of Article 15 proceedings for AWOL soldiers. I have only seen three go to court martial trial. It's easier to give a slap on the wrist and let the soldier walk away. As he is a soldier all the proceedings are done "in house" as are the punishments. Why go through the Dog and Pony show of a trial?
originally posted by: milomilo
i dont see why american people so riled up with this poor soldier's alleged behaviour.
They also receive funds from extortion, kidnappings and smuggling operations throughout eastern Afghanistan.[11] In an interview a former Haqqani commander called the extortion "the most important source of funding for the Haqqanis."[53] According to a tribal elder in Paktia, "Haqqani's people ask for money from contractors working on road construction. They are asking money or goods from shopkeepers… District elders and contractors are paying money to Afghan workers, but sometimes half of the money will go to Haqqani's people.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: milomilo
i dont see why american people so riled up with this poor soldier's alleged behaviour.
You just LUV him because he went and hung out with criminal Muslims for five years and that seems to be where your sympathies lie.
The truth of the matter ...
1 - He signed a contract.
2 - He failed to uphold his contract.
3 - He walked off the job so his 'back pay' should be withheld until after trial.
4 - He walked right into the arms of Americas enemies.
5 - He was willfully hanging out with the Haqqani Network. They are NOT the Taliban, but are associated with them. They are more like Muslim Mafia.
Haqqani Network Information
They also receive funds from extortion, kidnappings and smuggling operations throughout eastern Afghanistan.[11] In an interview a former Haqqani commander called the extortion "the most important source of funding for the Haqqanis."[53] According to a tribal elder in Paktia, "Haqqani's people ask for money from contractors working on road construction. They are asking money or goods from shopkeepers… District elders and contractors are paying money to Afghan workers, but sometimes half of the money will go to Haqqani's people.
This group isn't exactly a spiritual one. So any claims by you that he had some kind of enlightenment is dead wrong. This group wants Sharia, which is very, very bad ... especially for women. The group is mafia like in it's dealings ... shakedowns of governments and people and contractors. It uses extortion and kidnapping. It steals money from actual workers and uses those funds for deadly nefarious purposes.
These are the people that Bergdahl willingly broke his contract for. They are NOT good people.
originally posted by: milomilo
why would you call Afghani freedom fighters criminal ?
They also receive funds from extortion, kidnappings and smuggling operations throughout eastern Afghanistan.[11] In an interview a former Haqqani commander called the extortion "the most important source of funding for the Haqqanis."[53] According to a tribal elder in Paktia, "Haqqani's people ask for money from contractors working on road construction. They are asking money or goods from shopkeepers… District elders and contractors are paying money to Afghan workers, but sometimes half of the money will go to Haqqani's people.