It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Sammamishman
I believe you may be onto something. Wherever he is, and whatever he's doing -- I wish him the best. I, for one, won't ever look at UFO's the same way.
originally posted by: Sammamishman
a reply to: MystikMushroom
I feel the same way. I wish I could be in a group witnessing a UFO.
They'd be all like "OMFG" and having heart attacks, and I'll be like "Psssh, that was last years model".
[link]http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread961478/pg3[/link]
originally posted by: Astr0
Originally posted by crazyewok
reply to post by Astr0
Intresting.
With a airship a modular approach would be quite feasible.
Plus even if the idea of a orbital airship is not possible it would make some sense to go into the stratosphere and then launch a coventional payload into space.
A large, highly survivable craft, endurance measured in decades due to modular nature, equipped with varied ISR sensors and utilising a modular structure that is easy to repair and even easier to hide.
May of the super large triangles are seen launching from the oceans. Now if I was a researcher, I'd look at where these routes matched areas where ballistic and attack submarines either trained or transited through.
Iceland gap, Puerto Rico, Mid Atlantic... Pacific south of aussie land. Crews are perishable units and they need replacing every now and again.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: clay2 baraka
Yeah, I remember when that was first mentioned.
originally posted by: Sammamishman
a reply to: clay2 baraka
Do you have the link for where the illustration of he chevron came from?
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: clay2 baraka
That led me to find something very WTF.