posted on Aug, 11 2014 @ 06:42 PM
Why is it so hard to understand how much proof people want? There is a difference between being open minded, and naive.
The thing is the lack of logic behind those events. If something technologically advanced would want to hide it's presence, why would it do a light
show in the sky? Why would it have lights at all? Why assume it would use lights? Why assume it needs lights? Why not assume that when something needs
lights, it must be terrestrial instead? Isn't this reasonable? What is the possiblity of something alien actually needing light, why we assume their
eyes are built like ours? If they used light to show themselves, what for? What is the logic behind partially hiding presence?
It is simple things like that. Never a good answer, only wishful thinking and groundless speculations.
It is like someone saying "You know what, you won't believe it, yesterday I saw a squirell talking with a bear", "-ok, let's say I will accept the
possibility that animals can talk... what kind of mutual interest could a squirell have with a freaking bear?? That would be my doubt." It is not the
disbelief in the event itself, it is the doubt in the logic behind it.
edit on 11-8-2014 by iknowyou because: (no reason given)