It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: ErosA433
Hopefully in the next few years they will invest in "photon accelerators/colliders" in addition to particle accelerators and then the real magic will start to happen
You can't accelerate a photon.
You don't add anything to c, not even the speed of your car to the speed of the light from your headlights. Whoever made this was trolling, Feynman never said it, but it does highlight the somewhat non-intuitive nature of relativity since without relativity, it sounds fairly logical:
originally posted by: dashen
Do you add on the distance of the wavelength to its velocity?
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Arbitrageur
you dont add of course, you lose your cosmological constant.
but a super powerful gamma ray for instance would have a high "amplitude"(although that seems to be ignored in quantum physics).
Isnt the "amplitude"(height) of the wave/photon also a measurement of distance?
meaning if it was a sine wave it could strike something at any position along its forward yet winding path.
and since a sine wave stretched out is longer than a straight line, isnt the photon of a higher energy traversing more space (because of the "amplitude" of its wave) than the low energy one (not in a linear way, but in a wavy way i guess?)
originally posted by: dashen
In a linear way.
But when you're energized of photon to extreme levels the dips and peaks in the wave take up space too no?
And apparently it traverses the distance of its own wavelength while also traveling at 186,000 miles per second
.
Do you add on the distance of the wavelength to its velocity?
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Arbitrageur
you dont add of course, you lose your cosmological constant.
but a super powerful gamma ray for instance would have a high "amplitude"(although that seems to be ignored in quantum physics).
Isnt the "amplitude"(height) of the wave/photon also a measurement of distance?
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Bedlam
Why does the photon Shrink? This actually works well with my crazy theory about the photon. But I'll save that lunacy for later.
The more juice the smaller the caboose with a photon? How come?
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Bedlam
I always thought of the Amplitude of a photon to be similar visualization wise like the amperage in a electrical circuit. The frequency to be more like pulses per second or whatever the more energy and in return the shorter the wavelength and smaller a photon. The slower the pulses the longer the wavelength and less frequency.
Any help with this would be great.