It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"This planet has always been off balance. We can't change that because of the negative energy dominating this planet. But we can detach from that tit and rise above it."
~ Lou Baldin
Some religions are younger in time of Creation then others and so demonstrate elder immature behaviors that more mature religions of current have in the past as they developed.
This does not justify the behaviors or activities of ignorance w/ the younger religion(s) in no way as they if truly intelligent GOD followers however they interpret "THY" name would acknowledge past religions and negative deeds done in the past by the matured now and incorporate into the younger in Creation religion(s) NU ways to interact abroad.
To continue DEMONstrating certain immature behaviors and acts upon others only causes these younger
religions more instability which off sets followers of said religion(s).
This offsetting process can place many who are metaphysically accessible (unknowingly) as they pray misguidedly, in contact with the EXACT energy the religions are said to be against.
Placing these religion(s) in void somewhat as they are not metaphysically sending their prayers and thoughts to "THE" in which they claim to represent...
Nor are they acting as so requested by "THE" they worship
rev6:9
And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
rev 6:10
And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
rev 16:8-16:11
8 And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire.
9 And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.
10 And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain,
11 And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds.
rev 16:12-16:14
12 And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared.
13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
14 For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
Islam is a more recent religion than Christianity.
Christianity is a more recent religion than Judaism.
Judaism is a more recent religion than Hinduism.
Hinduism is a newer religion than Greek polytheism.
Greek polytheism is a newer religion than Hittite/Hurrians polytheism.
Hittite/Hurrian polytheism is newer religion than Egyptian polytheism.
Egyptian polytheism is a newer religion than Mesopotamian polytheism.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
However, the people of Mesopotamia never tried to force the people of Egypt to believe in their deities. The people of Egypt never tried to force the Hittites and Hurrians to believe in their deities. The Hittites and Hurrians never tried to force the Greeks and Hindus to believe in their deities. The Greeks and Hindus never tried to make the Jews believe in their deities. The Jews never...
Oh, wait. The Jews totally tried to make everyone believe in their deity. So did the Christians. And the Muslims.
I disagree that the "immature" behavior begins with the older religions. It began with Judaism.
This does not justify the behaviors or activities of ignorance w/ the younger religion(s) in no way as they if truly intelligent GOD followers however they interpret "THY" name would acknowledge past religions and negative deeds done in the past by the matured now and incorporate into the younger in Creation religion(s) NU ways to interact abroad.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
I'm having a little trouble following this part, but, I do agree that there is no justification for the lies and slander of the Jews, the ruthless murders and inquisitions of the Christians, or the thousands of innocents murdered by Islamic extremists.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
I also agree that it is important that the people who ascribe to these murderous faiths acknowledge their blood-soaked past. Just because you don't practice the same hatred, bigotry, and discrimination doesn't mean your faith wasn't built on it.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
If you could explain a little more these "NU" ways to act abroad I'd appreciate it. My observation of modern faiths is that they're imperialistic, and often times militaristic. They storm in and try to tell the people of foreign lands what to think, what to believe, who to love, who to despise, who to bless and who to damn.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
Frankly, it would be a lot better if modern faiths embraced the ancient faith's technique of coalescing and syncreticism.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
Take the goddess Inanna from Sumer as an example. Inanna was accepted by the Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians as the goddess Ishtar. In turn, Ishtar was accepted by the Canaanites and Phoenicians as Astarte. Astarte then went on to enjoy worship and reverence in both Egypt and Greece under that same name, and became the goddess Shaushka in Asia Minor among the Hittite and Hurrian people.
Sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Kassites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Hittites, Hurrians, and Greeks all harmoniously participating in the worship of a single divine principle. What happened when the Jews were invited to share in the gathering? Astarte became Ashtoreth, a "false-god" and fiend. What did the Christians do? They elevated her to the Queen of Hell, one of Satan's primary ministers.
How much better a world it would be if we followed the path of Inanna, not the path of Ashtoreth.
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
I'd like you to elaborate on this point too, please. Not all religions claim a "defense" against something. Many of them are provided as a comfort and source of strength to the acolyte in times of stress and trial. It sounds like you're coming from the angle that all religions presuppose a black-and-white scale of Good (God) and Evil (Devil). This is simply not true.
If this example I shared is more accurate and not just wording put together with another meaning or symbolism, then yes exist a time period for the Souls here manifested in the physical bodies they are within to leave those bodies to go elsewhere.
originally posted by: Unity_99
Egads, rereading what you wrote, on that possibility of being "slain" to be portalled out, nope nada, nay say on the whole concept. Only in positive ways.
Your points are valid. 1 does feel some of those more ancient religions may have had disagreements in their regions if not more until they were established.
1 is saying with the intelligence / awareness levels possessed today by many worshipers that many should of learned from past mistakes made by elder religions... And should be doing NU things to assist-upgrade the species overall. Otherwise the species is held back and trapped in vicious ignorance cycles until self-freed.
Whether its INNANA (LORD ENLIL grand daughter) or MARDUK (son of LORD ENKI) it is still the ANNUNAKI influencing the planet from ENKITE to ENLILITE based influences which 1 is not arguing against.
But if the HUMAN supporters and broadcasters - transmitters of the ANNUNAKI data are not in sync with each others teachings the same issues will rise of side picking and then fighting. And as you see there are no sides for you basically by sharing LUNA GODDESS INNANA influence verify ALL are 1 which I like
originally posted by: Wandering Scribe
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13
There's no godly war recorded in Sumerian literature, and Enlil was not the only King of the Gods. I'm very curious what sources you're drawing your information from, could you share them with me?
According to the ancient Sumerian texts, the Sumerian god, Anu, the “supreme Lord of the Sky”, the currently reigning titular head of the Sumerian Family Tree, had two sons. They were Enki (Ea), Lord of the Earth and Waters (whose mother was Antu), and Enlil (Ilu), Lord of the Air and Lord of the Command (whose mother was Ki).
These two half-brothers -- surprise, surprise -- did not get along.
Critical to their rivalry -- particularly from Earth’s viewpoint -- was the fact that Enki had been the first of the Anunnaki to hazard a trip to Earth to begin a mining operation for gold. When this effort did not apparently produce gold in sufficient quantities, Enlil was brought in, given command, and armed with a new plan (an early version of the New Deal). The revised program was to mine gold from deep mines in the Earth
Sounds fair. However. As Laurence Gardner points out: “Enki was not happy about his brother’s promotion because, although Enlil was the elder of the two, his mother (Ki) was Anu’s junior sister, whereas Enki’s mother (Antu) was the senior sister. True kingship, claimed Enki, progressed as a matrilineal institution through the female line, and by this right of descent Enki maintained that he was the first born of the royal succession.”
“I am the great brother of the gods.
I am he who has been born as the first son of the divine Anu.”
“Abraham had experienced the vengeful Enlil first hand at the fall of Ur, and he was not about to take any chances with his own survival. He was even prepared to sacrifice the life of his young son, Isaac, to appease the implacable God (Genesis 32:9).” “The oriental scholar Henri Frankfort summarized the situation by making the point that... ‘Those who served Jehovah must forego the richness, the fulfillment, and the consolation of a life which moves in tune with the great rhythms of the earth and sky.”
Bramley [3] has noted that, “We therefore find Ea [Enki] as the reputed culprit who tried to teach early man (Adam) the way to spiritual freedom. This suggests that Ea intended his creation, Homo sapiens, to be suited for Earth labor, but at some point he changed his mind about using spiritual enslavement as a means.”
From a Biblical perspective, it was Enki who (with the critical assistance of his half-sister, Ninki, aka Nin-khursag) created Adam and Eve.
It was Enlil, on the other hand, who created “Edin”. Enki was the serpent in the garden, who urged Adam and Eve to eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil (which was infinitely beneficial to their spiritual growth).
It was Enlil, who drove them out of Edin, while Enki was there to clothe them. It is worth noting that Zecharia Sitchin [2] claims that the biblical word for “snake” is nahash, which comes from the root word NHSH, and which means “to decipher, to find out.” In other words, Enki, the God of Wisdom.
Abraham and his descendants served Enlil, and followed his precepts. The Egyptians, on the other hand, were Enki’s protégés, and based on food management practices during the devastating droughts around the time of Jacob and Joseph, were doing a lot better than Enlil’s followers.