It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HauntWok
And we are back at that again are we?
And I said that it would have to be a separate appropriations bill from the military appropriations bill, and since we can't be having any unpaid for expenses, that would mean that arming the Militia would be through surplus equipment.
I say the early Vietnam Era M-16 would be appropriate for the Militia.
originally posted by: HauntWok
Yes, depose a tyrannical government (England) not the constitutionally elected body of the United States Government. Actually in fact, according to the United States Constitution that is REALLY illegal:
Article III Section 3 of the United States Constitution:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Hmm, declaring war against the United States would definitely qualify as Treason, and not really be a roll the Militia's are authorized to do.
No need to start executing constitutionally elected citizens of this nation because you don't like how politics is played.
originally posted by: HauntWok
No sir, i replied to your post about American history, you did not like the source material, i provided alternate source material.
originally posted by: HauntWok
That was it.
I'm certainly not going to let you goad me into another round of insults. Insult me all you like. I have thick skin. I'm just not going to fall for the bait anymore.
Thank you.
originally posted by: HauntWok
I have theorized a mutually beneficial solution to the mass shooting epidemic. And i have been met with ridicule and scorn. I don't really care though, pragmatic ideas often are scary to some people.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: macman
I've only been given opinion disguised as fact, I've been given conjecture, assumption, and lack of critical thinking.
All in the guise of "calling me out" as you say.
I have theorized a mutually beneficial solution to the mass shooting epidemic. And i have been met with ridicule and scorn. I don't really care though, pragmatic ideas often are scary to some people.