Sending a picture of your underaged penis illegal, police taking many pictures of your underaged pen

page: 9
58
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 07:28 PM
link   
a reply to: TKDRL
Used source link, the update to the story is linked above the original. Probably trying to get it to go away quietly.

From the quoted law:

B. A person shall be guilty of production of child pornography who:

1. Accosts, entices or solicits a person less than 18 years of age with intent to induce or force such person to perform in or be a subject of child pornography; or linked from there.

I think they may have seen the error of their ways. If the timeline is correct the girl is the guilty party.

Of course, we do not have the entire conversation.

Stupid on both their parts.

Should never have been a case.




posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: wokeupdead
Good on WaPo for adding the updated link on the original story, I didn't expect that, so I didn't even bother checking it



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 07:49 PM
link   


Sending a picture of your underaged penis illegal,


I would hope so.





police taking many pictures of your underaged pen


But that is ILLEGAL ! !

Someone needs to add the coppers to the sex offender registry.



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 07:56 PM
link   
Yep, the more I think about it, if the law is the law relevant to this kids sexting....then it should also apply to the various politicians that have been caught in the act. That Weiner guy should be force fed an overdose of Viagra and have his "junk" examined and photographed, in case he decides to harass certain women folk that do not wish to be subjected to such material. That way if they have Weiners "lil weiner" on file, it can be easily identified. Whats good for the lil goose should be good for the gander too. After all, the law is the law some folks here say.

Too much Viagra can cause serious health complications relevant to that "area" of the body and is very painful. That boy will be getting some kind of injection to cause erection it is being said...yet, there is a little poison in every medication. I hope it doesn't cause problems for him. What a bunch of crap all the way around. Perhaps any sicko politicos that have been caught should be treated likewise or worse but that probably won't happen. Hmmm, the blurring of lines and the law again.



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: shrevegal
Supposedly they have decided against the drugging part, but yeah they already took some penis mugshots when he was arrested. I still don't see how that can be legal.



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: TKDRL

uh, hmmm. No no, wait......


Underaged penis no good
Underaged penis no good when unenraged. But, unenraged penis could
still be good if not underaged. So it is better to go thru life unenraged
if you're underaged?

And these kids are supposed to make it thru puberty?

I say perge the earth.



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 08:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: TKDRL

uh, hmmm. No no, wait......


Underaged penis no good
Underaged penis no good when unenraged. But, unenraged penis could
still be good if not underaged. So it is better to go thru life unenraged
if you're underaged?

And these kids are supposed to make it thru puberty?

I say perge the earth.


Don't forget underaged is ok if post-engaged..
Or,
With parental Consent from the deranged..

Bye now.

In all seriousness. I am full of disbelief and disgust..



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 09:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: charles1952

"OK, son, roll up your sleeve, you'll just feel a little prick. (Sometimes I crack myself up.)" Is this stage one of torture or some kid getting a flu shot? No way to tell.


********************************************************************************************************************************
Sorry if this has already been addressed, but it's not a shot in the arm to produce an erection.

IT'S A SHOT IN THE PENIS!!!!!

And I'm pretty willing to bet good money that you won't find a doctor in the entire United States that would agree to do it, especially since the side effects can be severe and permanent.

How is the judge ordering this for 'evidence' purposes, and the picture thereof, not ordering child pornography to be produced?

Seems like the cell phones and the pictures thereon, both the boy's and the girl's, are all the 'evidence' you need, and the only one with their nose out of joint here is the girl's idiot mother who should have reacted by possibly taking her daughter's cell phone away and that's about it.

Hell, these kids are the ages of Romeo and Juliet. I can see this scenario playing itself out to a double suicide because of the immense amounts of embarrassment and life-changing threats to someone that this could easily become, if it hasn't yet. I just hope both kids have a sense of humor and proportion, because the adults certainly seem to be lacking it.
edit on 1600107pmThursdayf00Thu, 10 Jul 2014 22:00:16 -0500America/Chicago by signalfire because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 10:05 PM
link   
a reply to: signalfire
I wouldn't be willing to bet good money on it these days, especially after the whole forced enema fiasco not too long ago.



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 10:47 PM
link   
a reply to: defuntion

The only agenda I can fathom at this point?

TPTB are collectively collaborating in combination. A concatenation
of contrivence constructs and concessions, to constantly confuse the
cognitive continuously, even unto completion of contracted caustic
consequence.

In other words, it looks like their screwing with our kids minds so bad.
And making this world so intolerable, most will just off themselves.

That's what I see. Looking ahead.



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 11:03 PM
link   
a reply to: signalfire

Dear signalfire,

It seems I owe you and everyone else an apology.

I apparently made the wrong assumption about the location of the injection. If I were in the kid's shoes, I'd say "You're going to WHAT?? Forget it, I'll do it myself."

Would any doctor do it? Of course, they've done much worse for medical reasons.

I'm not sure the rest of your post needs commentary. Some of it would be redundant anyway. But if you want to know, I'll provide some.

With respect,
Charles1952



posted on Jul, 11 2014 @ 05:33 PM
link   
And as far as under-aged peni (that is plural form, no?) what about when the penis is underage but the body it's attached to is not? And what about time zones... as in under-aged in Asia but of age in Greenwich Standard Time, with time zones and such?

I sometimes despair over officious bureaucracies and their undermining everything noble and wise about the human spirit.



posted on Jul, 11 2014 @ 11:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Fylgje
This is the type of mindset that is prevalent in every branch of govt in America. Absolutely zero common sense and completely morally bankrupt. These are the people in control!


Actually, I'd be willing to be that the CP/sexting craze has two facets:

1. Private prisons wanting more money
2. Politicians involved in these scandals that need to create monsters out of everyday people to insure they are never found out.

There are definitely sub-levels to these ideas because both are tied back to politicians.

At any rate, if this PD goes through with this ridiculousness I hope someone gets the bright idea to press charges against the PD and City. I can't wait to hear the SCOTUS ruling on it.



posted on Jul, 18 2014 @ 11:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: charles1952
a reply to: Nyiah


How in the hell is forcing someone via drugs to have an erection not sexual abuse/rape?? Effing how?
I'm sorry, but I have to reverse your question. Do you happen to have a definition of rape available? If not, use mine:

Virginia rape law as of 2013

§ 18.2-61. Rape.

A. If any person has sexual intercourse with a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, or causes a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, to engage in sexual intercourse with any other person and such act is accomplished (i) against the complaining witness's will, by force, threat or intimidation of or against the complaining witness or another person; or (ii) through the use of the complaining witness's mental incapacity or physical helplessness; or (iii) with a child under age 13 as the victim, he or she shall be guilty of rape.


leg1.state.va.us...

Whether we agree or not, we're not looking at rape, sorry. But what about sexual abuse? There, you might have something. By looking at the statute with just a little squint, sexual abuse seems possible. I know I could make out a case for it, and probably win, BUT (There's always that *?&^*% BUT, isn't there?)

The first "But" is who would you go after. Your best case would be if the doctor administering the injection, also told him to take his pants off. In that case, of course the doctor is the person to go after. I bet an infinite amount of money no one would prosecute the doctor for following the instructions of a judge.

The other "But" is Virginia's law on search warrants, which is what we're dealing with.


§ 19.2-53. What may be searched and seized.

Search warrants may be issued for the search of or for specified places, things or persons, and seizure therefrom of the following things as specified in the warrant:

(1) Weapons or other objects used in the commission of crime;

(2) Articles or things the sale or possession of which is unlawful;

(3) Stolen property or the fruits of any crime;

(4) Any object, thing, or person, including without limitation, documents, books, papers, records or body fluids, constituting evidence of the commission of crime. Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter to the contrary, no search warrant may be issued as a substitute for a witness subpoena.


leg1.state.va.us...

Sub section (4) seems to make a pretty good case for searching the kid in very intimate ways. Here, they're taking a photograph. They could have been asking for semen (yuck).

So, sorry. No rape, no sexual abuse. We may not like it, but that's what they've got to work with.


Nothing there says "forcibly injecting drugs against his will to make his penis erect and then take pics".

So no I don't agree with any of that. This is straight up legal rape and abuse.





top topics
 
58
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join