It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sending a picture of your underaged penis illegal, police taking many pictures of your underaged pen

page: 2
58
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: TKDRL

Both the police, and he young person who initiated the communication involving a picture of their equipment, so to speak, should be prosecuted. It's a vile and ungentlemanly practice to photobomb people with pictures of ones privates, and it ought to be sternly punished. However, law enforcement should not have the right to force an erection on a minor, just to prove such a case.




posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: AutumnWitch657

Guys have been leaving pictures of their junk around since time in memorial. LOL

World's Earliest Erotic Graffiti Found





edit on 9-7-2014 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mamatus
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Well that is somewhat of a relief. Being nearly 50 years old precludes me from having had to worry about such things. However when I was 18? Oh man.........

Todays kids are screwed. I wonder how many will make it to adulthood without getting arrested.....


Yea, the reason I'm aware of them is because I had a gf who was 15 or 16 when I was 18 back in 2003. Of course that was 11 years ago, so the laws may have changed since then, but I doubt it. The child porn thing is more of a hot issue then an 18 y/o having sex with a 16 y/o though with the sexting and all. It's funny how lawmakers care more about a picture of someone naked but could care less about the people actually BEING naked together. Classic case of lawmakers and their laws not being able to keep up with the times.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 01:55 PM
link   
a reply to: TKDRL

Teenage sexuality shouldn't be illegalized.

I remember when I was 14 and had my first crush. It was like a light switch and all my brain could think about was women from that moment forward.

Why in the hell are you criminalizing something that is natural(or should be natural) to teenagers?

As I always say, the only teenagers that don't want sex are the ones who have been abused.

I'm so tired of this #ed up system that creates criminals out of thin air and ruins lives.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: TKDRL

[snip]

so, (unnamed) girl's ma presses charges, someone a lot smarter than anyone currently involved in the case had em dismissed, ma presses charges again, prosecution pushes for dickpic, even if you have to dope the kid up to the gills with cialis like some 2-bit congressman to get it. ma's rich, connected, or both is where my money's at.
edit on 9-7-2014 by elevatedone because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: TKDRL

Speechless and saving a spot in this thread.

This case has been dismissed once. DA gets a new search warrant and charge the kid again? They are being awfully hard on him.

Also, I can't see any doctor performing this injection. Totally unethical and not binded by law to perform it. Plus, I imagine it would be hard on his/her conscience.

Did I mention the hard on?

What a wacky world we live in.

edit on 9-7-2014 by UFO1414 because: Spelling



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:05 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: ATODASO

Why isn't the daughter being charged?

Makes me think of double standards.

What the hell's wrong with people?

Also, the mom's a goddamned sexual predator.

Imagine this scenario:

Dad finds his daughter looking at pictures of her teenage lesbian lover's boobs. Files charges, charges get dropped. Dad files again. Prosecution then forces the teenage girl to have pictures taken of her boobs(or V jay, whatever).

What's wrong with the double standards?
edit on 9-7-2014 by OrphanApology because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: TKDRL

This is just too outrageous. According to the article, if the kid is tried & convicted, he could not only face incarceration until he's 21, but would also probably have to register as a sex offender, probably for his lifetime.

I hope the legal proceedings keep coming up before a judge who realizes how much hysterical overreaction & faulty application of basically needed law is involved here. If I read this in a work of fiction, I'd consider it pretty good satire. As reality? Well, every time I think I know how stupid things can get these days...



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzCory




probably have to register as a sex offender, probably for his lifetime.


And that will follow him for the rest of his life and damn near ruin it.

This is ridiculous....
Next they will be going after anyone with a snapchat!



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Jaellma
I called and gave a piece of my mind.
I am lucky I was a teen before the whole CP madness rained down upon society. Hell, I got some compromising photos in my albums that could probably technically have me jailed, teenage boobs, the horror.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:19 PM
link   
This is the type of mindset that is prevalent in every branch of govt in America. Absolutely zero common sense and completely morally bankrupt. These are the people in control!



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:22 PM
link   
This story was linked to me by a friend about 30 minutes ago.

What.

The.

Hell?

I think somone should phone the sick irony police on the police.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:25 PM
link   
Poor kid. Make one stupid mistake and it's there for the world to judge; every teenager's worst nightmare. What a humiliating episode for him.







edit on 9-7-2014 by NarcolepticBuddha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: thisguyrighthere
God, I'm so lucky this level of crazy didnt come into being until after my school years.


Yup. One would need a Polaroid (what is that?), an envelope and stamps.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:26 PM
link   
If i was that kid and i did send the pic, wouldnt it just be easier to admit it rather than have officer joe take sexy pics of my junk.....

Surely thats an option for the kid?



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: BuzzCory
a reply to: TKDRL
I hope the legal proceedings keep coming up before a judge who realizes how much hysterical overreaction & faulty application of basically needed law is involved here. If I read this in a work of fiction, I'd consider it pretty good satire. As reality? Well, every time I think I know how stupid things can get these days...



Barney Fife must have been the arresting officer. With a bit of hope, the local judge is more the Andy, Justice of the Peace type. The case has already been dismissed once, yet they're wasting time and resources pursuing the case further, making fools of themselves and our justice system in the process.

Some real top-notch forensic work. "Well, Chief, we uh... Gotta make this kid get a boner, okay? No, wait, hear me out... We need to take a picture of it to use as evidence in the prosecution of his heinous crime of.... taking a picture of his own boner."

I think some days the Universe just throws a curveball to the headline writers of the world.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:31 PM
link   
The Virginia legislature passed a law making illegal what this teenage boy did. It also presented sentencing guidelines. I can see arguing that what he did might not have been stupid, but simply an expression of romantic love in a yong person's mind, bla-bla, bla-bla, blah.

But there is absolutely no basis to question whether what he did was illegal. It was, and the girl's mother filed a complaint. Does anybody have any problems so far? If you do, stop reading because you won't like the rest of it.

Courts have required breath samples, voice samples, hair samples, hand writing samples, DNA samples, and probably more I don't know about. They've ordered searches, at one time or another, of every aspect of an individual and his property, including making them sit on a transparent toilet with transparent piping and special access doors to retrieve swallowed items. And just now you're starting to complain? Is this off limits because it's sexual, the only sacred thing left in America, in the minds of many?

In this case, the kid's a minor. If he doesn't demand a jury trial, the only people who will ever see it are the lawyers, the Judge, and the police evidence technician. Besides, how many of you have said that if you put something on your phone, you might as well expect it will be public someday.

The kid claims he didn't do it, the police are gathering evidence. Have we reached the stage where you are perfectly content to disregard laws which are inconvenient or unpleasant? What are you, Obama fans?



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: charles1952

Have we reached the stage where you are perfectly content to disregard laws which are inconvenient or unpleasant? What are you, Obama fans?


I reached that stage about 30 years ago.

Where there is no direct harm to person or property there is no crime AFAIC.

"The law is the law is the law" is a simple rule for a simple mind.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 02:40 PM
link   
Well thank you, admin, for removing my thread content that had the telephone number to the prosecutor's office.

I don't see how the thread is "drifting" with that piece of damning information?





top topics



 
58
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join