It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Chronogoblin
Read a short story in Jr. High, about a plantation in South America. The story was about the main character's battles with mother nature, in the form of the indomitable army ant. Around his property, was a 20' deep trench, which would be filled with diesel, and lit aflame in the case of an attacking hoard of army ants tried to invade his property. One poster earlier said something about similar cases being studied, and dismissed. However, I am wondering how many of them are ancient, and how many are recent?
Even a full excavation of a select few of these sites with trees removed and everything, would be a pin-prick compared to the damage caused by deforestation yet they could reveal bucket-loads of information and evidence about the inhabitants of these sites and the history of south America.
originally posted by: stormcell
originally posted by: intrptr
From the link:
Since the 1980s, however, deforestation has revealed massive earthworks in the form of ditches up to 16 feet (5 meters) deep, and often just as wide.
Pretty big ditches. So what did they use these for?
Moats? Flood barriers? Defense against big critters?
Too bad we have to deforest the planet to make these discoveries. I prefer the forest for the trees.
My first guess is that they were filled with water and used as a moat, though having that much stagnant water might encourage mosquitos. Defence against large critters and invaders would seem a better reason. Combine those ditches with high earth or wood walls, and you would have a very secure home safe against snakes and alligators.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
originally posted by: intrptr
By the way, thats why nectar in flowers tastes so good, too. Fauna (unknowingly) tempts the critters and insects (that the trees don't know exist) to pollinate and carry off their seeds.
Now someone will prove me wrong and say trees and flowers know the birds and the bees are there.
Proof?
Maybe not "proof" of actual knowledge of the fauna (fauna is animals, flora is plants) by the flora, but it's at least a cool read.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: eriktheawful
Sorry for the delay…
So lemee seee…
the fruit has seeds, the crap has seeds, the crap is fertilizer for the seeds, the animals "plant" the crap fertilized seeds far from the source of the parent tree…
by design… or happenstance?