It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Today there's no legislation regarding how much intelligence a machine can have, how interconnected it can be. If that continues, look at the exponential trend. We will reach the singularity in the timeframe most experts predict. From that point on you're going to see that the top species will no longer be humans, but machines."
"Machines will make breakthroughs in medical technology, most of the human race will have more leisure time, and we'll think we've never had it better. The concern I'm raising is that the machines will view us as an unpredictable and dangerous species.
They might view us the same way we view harmful insects. Humans are a species that is unstable, creates wars, has weapons to wipe out the world twice over, and makes computer viruses."
originally posted by: eManym
No way machines can outclass humans. Machines require electricity. Deprive a machine of electricity and it is useless. Besides, machines modeled after humans can't be any better than humans.
originally posted by: Snarl
AI has always fascinated me. What would a machine want to achieve? I seriously doubt a machine would have anywhere near the same goals of a biological entity ... nor would they care about the continued existence of them.
originally posted by: _BoneZ_
a reply to: Snarl
When a machine becomes self aware and able to protect itself, it essentially becomes sentient. Machines will then become their own species.
They will care about the existence of humans once they see that humans are or can be harmful to them or their existence.