Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

David Paulides downplays mountain lions!!!

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 2 2014 @ 09:49 PM
link   
I've listened to a lot of his interviews,I did'nt so much get the idea that he downplays mountain lions,in general.I rather got the sense that after considering all possible normal explanations,he admits when he is stumped-exactly because he exhaustively searched for rational explanations.Either way,deeply depressing subject matter.a reply to: GreenMtnBoys




posted on Nov, 2 2014 @ 10:10 PM
link   
What would be most helpful of all,imo,would be if the Parks department would keep lists of all the people going missing,which apparently they don't.And start talking about all the mysterious disappearances.From listening to his interviews I have to wonder why they are being so secretive,and why they are so reluctant to release information.If we could have some whistleblowers from their ranks,I think the public may get a huge shock.a reply to: Tangerine



posted on Nov, 4 2014 @ 09:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raxoxane
What would be most helpful of all,imo,would be if the Parks department would keep lists of all the people going missing,which apparently they don't.And start talking about all the mysterious disappearances.From listening to his interviews I have to wonder why they are being so secretive,and why they are so reluctant to release information.If we could have some whistleblowers from their ranks,I think the public may get a huge shock.a reply to: Tangerine


not only that, but it would be helpful to see if there were similarities between the missing and those found dead. there seems to be some sort of 'conspiracy of silence' going on which, you are right, it is very disturbing



posted on Dec, 6 2014 @ 05:02 AM
link   
I think people are misinterpreting the reason behind Paulides' books. As has been said, he makes no assumptions and offers no solutions (beyond occasionally saying what he would have done in terms of an investigation/search).

A lot of reviews or opinions come from people who say "Oh you wrote a Bigfoot book. So, Bigfoot's taking people, huh? You have proof it exists?"
Paulides never once implies Bigfoot is taking anyone. The only time Bigfoot (or possible maybe Bigfoots) are mentioned is if it happens to come up in the actual account. Mostly he uses the terms used in original articles, lays out the facts he's discovered and says "This person disappeared here at this time. Here's the circumstances, here's the search and it's results."

My point? It doesn't really matter who or what is taking these people. Bigfoot, mountain lions, gnomes, 'little people' or whatever. What matters is that there is a criminally negligent attitude towards the disappearances from the higher ups of the Park service which, due to their lack of record keeping and playing down of cases, puts even more people at risk.
If records were kept we'd be able to see who's going and when. And using that we can determine what's causing it and what can be done to prevent it.



posted on Dec, 11 2014 @ 02:46 AM
link   
a reply to: JackofBlades

SUPPOSEDLY, David has finally come up with a hypothesis that he is keeping under the wraps until he finishes his next 411 book (it'll be in the book)



posted on Dec, 17 2014 @ 01:35 AM
link   
I bet he ends up coming to a Supernatural/Cryptid conclusion. Everything Ive read and heard leads to that guess.





new topics

top topics
 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join