It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rex282
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
Did he hate on Mary Magdalene?? Or did he hold out his hand to her as the people were screaming for blood, and ask that he who is without sin to cast the first stone??
I think that pretty much answers the question.
He hated no one. Not even those that were sent to kill him. That says a lot I think.
The woman that was caught in the act of fornication WAS NOT Mary Magdalene.
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
originally posted by: Rex282
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
Did he hate on Mary Magdalene?? Or did he hold out his hand to her as the people were screaming for blood, and ask that he who is without sin to cast the first stone??
I think that pretty much answers the question.
He hated no one. Not even those that were sent to kill him. That says a lot I think.
The woman that was caught in the act of fornication WAS NOT Mary Magdalene.
Which is why I am not, nor claim to be a biblical scholar. He did however say... (Regardless of who was present at the time) Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. As far as I know, it's the same now as it was then... Nobody was/is able to cast that first stone.
originally posted by: beezzer
Now would Jesus object to two men wanting to love each other and spend their lives together?
GOD cursed adam and eve to bring about children and crops and marriage is a bond that helps complete the curse. living outside that curse is unforfilling. So in essance two same sex people marring would be dooming themselves to not being able to forfill the curse in this life. Nice to see you here debating in this forum.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: ketsuko
Okay. Again, fair enough.
My counter. . .
Marriage was an institution designed primarily for children.
Now would Jesus object to two men wanting to love each other and spend their lives together?
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
Oh... I was supposed to consider Jesus in that?? I thought everyone pretty much knew He was without sin? I also didn't think He was talking to Himself about casting the first stone, but to the crowd of people that were present.
My apologies for anyone who was not aware that Jesus was the one person in the crowd able to cast the first stone. I ASSumed most people were quite aware of that fact.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
Nice to see you here debating in this forum.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
originally posted by: AfterInfinity
a reply to: charles1952
There is no way to find Jesus saying that "homosexuality is a fine and natural thing to do, I don't have any problems with it."
Telling a homosexual that God doesn't like their behavior shouldn't be an act of hate, ideally it should be a loving warning.
Too bad he didn't come down and have a word with the WBC about that. And every other bigoted idiot capable of waving a sign and pointing a finger.
I agree. I guess He figured that He left them a book and they ignored that...
Religion is a lot like IKEA.
No-one reads the instructions.
originally posted by: KaelemJames
Fact is fact. Truth is truth. Homosexuality is a sin for the Christian. Like it or not.
So, where in the Gospels does Jesus say that the traditional Hebrew teaching on homosexuality was wrong? Nowhere. That is an indication that he did not disagree with it.
originally posted by: adjensen
Beez, since Jesus didn't say anything about homosexuality, your answer lies in what he didn't say.
Jesus was an obedient Jew, the only truly obedient Jew, in fact. That means that he knew the Law, and he would have known about Hebrew condemnation of homosexuality. Now, he was never hesitant to point out errors that the Pharisees and Sadducees were making in their interpretation of the Law, and the revelations of Peter and Paul in Acts of the Apostles make it clear that when something in the Law was incorrect or invalid (like not eating "unclean" food,) a sign would be shown regarding it.
So, where in the Gospels does Jesus say that the traditional Hebrew teaching on homosexuality was wrong? Nowhere. That is an indication that he did not disagree with it. And where in the New Testament is there a revelation to one of the Apostles that the teaching was incorrect or invalid? Nowhere. That is an indication that it is not incorrect or invalid.
Finally, I agree with you and others who have said that Jesus would not be "hating on teh gays." I believe that his perspective would be the same as the Catholic Church, which is "there is nothing sinful about a celibate homosexual, and a fornicating homosexual is no more a sinner than a fornicating heterosexual is." We believe that sex, outside of the sacrament of marriage, is a sin, no matter who's doing it or what they're doing. And we do not marry two men or two women, because of what I laid out above -- Christ never retracted those Levitical Laws.