It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
can you at least understand the incredulousness of someone who is rather skeptical about all things religion?
when someone is trying to convince you that their god is real and in one breath expounds how their god is omnipotent and omniscient and in the next breath go on to talk about how god is so mysterious and he communicates in ways we least expect. It just sounds less plausible than Santa Claus coming down the chimney to me.
If god is all knowing and all powerful he should have the ability to make his message clear and concise and be all about a show of power to evidence his greatness and his reality. It seems counter productive to me to be so mysterious if you want everyone in the universe to believe in you and accept your divinity.
originally posted by: Akragon
IF God is all powerful and all knowing etc etc... and said entity created everything you see, and even what you can not... Is that not somewhat of a show of said power?
How do I know he created it??? Since he's not here to tell me personally or to verify such a claim it's just a guess like any other.
Also, we know now that things that were once attributed to God or Magic or supernatural power, we know have different explanations.
What if it was a whole team of Gods who created it???
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: peter vlar
Religion?
I thought we were talking about God...
IF God is all powerful and all knowing etc etc... and said entity created everything you see, and even what you can not... Is that not somewhat of a show of said power?
Sure, but you can't talk about god without talking about man made religion.
god doesn't speak for himself, his divine word was interpreted by men. written by men, taught by men, proselytized by men. From an evidentiary perspective, god is someone else's bag man. i.e. there's nothing to support the existence of a divine, omnipotent being aside from the word of bronze age priests who just happened to be the only literate guys on the block which put them firmly in control of god and gods wants and needs and thus what god wanted from man. it's a fine formula for control.
No, as I have not witnessed the creation of all you describe therefore the onus would be upon your god to "show himself" and demonstrate his true self/nature.
originally posted by: Akragon
that doesn't really matter much... its here, so are we... so why not just roll with it?
Sure, we're learning... perhaps even evolving...
I would say there would be confusion... anarchy....
Similar to ancient times I suppose... Though it seems we're getting back to that point slowly
Well it matters because there are so many insisting upon it and insisting that everyone also believe it too.
If, like mwood above explained, that everyone just agreed that none of us know, then that would be fine. But not everyone does. Some are very aggressive sometimes even that everyone else believe the way they believe and they even claim to absolutely know it.
I'm good with that too. But like I said above, some are incredibly intense that what you said isn't true and more importantly that everyone else must also say it isn't true as well.
Seems pretty confusing to me right now too. I'm not sure whether a lesser amount of Gods is really the problem in this case. Be it one or one hundred, anarchy and confusion seem to be unavoidable.
As long as I'm not condescended to, or have it pushed on me, I could really care less. Though I've never quite understood zeal. That's something that raises my eyebrow