It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mOjOm
True. As a business owner you feel you are entitled the right to pick and choose what you pay for as far as health care, while everyone else doesn't get that choice.
originally posted by: mOjOm
You want the special rights because of your religious beliefs. Read that again. Special Rights because of your Religious Beliefs. That is the entitlement right there. Because those who aren't Religious or of a Religion that allows birth control just have to pay up as usual.
originally posted by: mOjOm
Once again, you want special rights that others don't get. Simple as that.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
What is this Republican OBSESSION with repeating over and over "pay for it themselves'???
They WERE paying for "it" for themselves, via their insurance benefit.
NOW, thanks to this unprecedented aping of a real court ruling, the Public Health systems will be forced to pay for these items.
It is, in fact, Hobby Lobby's action that moves the purchase from a person's own resources to the public dole.
So, I hope all that are continuously whining and harping on "entitlement" get that through your heads.
originally posted by: SearchLightsInc
originally posted by: macman
originally posted by: SearchLightsInc
Why am i angry about this decision even though im (thankfully) not american?
That is all I needed to read.
Carry on.
As your american, i'd expect that is ALL you would read haha
Invade first ask questions later?
originally posted by: beezzer
Some interesting meme's coming out.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a stay at home mom doesn't have an employer
the husband of that stay at home mom could conceivably have the funds to so shopping on the open market for an alternative.
my question is:
will he be able to find an acceptable plan that will pass the gov't scrutiny and avoid the fine?
originally posted by: dawnstar
I am kind of doubtful that he will be able to!
when it comes to religious rights we all should be protected weather we be employer or whatever.
originally posted by: dawnstar
and
www.scotusblog.com...
this is a list of cases that followed the hobby lobby case
please take note that all those cases that sided with the employer in lower courts and the the gov't challenged a have been denied
those that the gov't won in the lower court and are being challenged by the employer will be reviewed.. Many of these are catholic plaintiffs and they are objecting to all preventive coverage!
that should but probably won't give a clear enough indication at to where the supremes are going with this!