It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Weird California sighting

page: 21
134
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 04:13 AM
link   


This one?
ichef.bbci.co.uk...


That was it, cheers buddy!




posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 07:31 AM
link   
a reply to: darksidius

If your referring to the aircraft that crashed in NM that was another one.
edit on 7-7-2014 by B2StealthBomber because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 08:48 AM
link   
a reply to: darksidius

It might have been.



posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: B2StealthBomber

maybe I'm thinking of the wrong thing but wasn't that a RQ-180?



posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: BlackDog10

It was an undisclosed UAV. It fell under the classification clause of the AIB reports, so it could have been anything.



posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: BlackDog10

I'm not exactly sure to be honest..



posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: B2StealthBomber
Not the crash just the sighting of another green light Zaphod speak about .



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 10:33 AM
link   
My crystal ball says there will be a few more sightings of a green light in the next few weeks.



posted on Jul, 9 2014 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58
Cool I like the green color . Must staying alert on new sighting report




posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 01:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Astr0

originally posted by: BlackDog10
What I don't understand is if they have an aircraft that is 'doom' for anybody, why would they not reveal it as a deterrent? Or maybe they would if it would actually have to be used....

Shades of Strangelove


1) the day it takes off in public for the first time, bricks will be sh#t. That I promise you.

2) the day it floats out a hanger, the internet stops working.

3) The world record for OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1ALIEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!111111 AREA51 ROSWELLL!!!!!!!!!!!!11 TRUTH THEY HID IT OMGGGGGGGZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!! Probably will be held by an ATS member.


I don't know how I missed this thread but this might be the best post I have ever seen.

Actually I spoke way too soon. There were much cooler posts after that. Hands down one of the best threads I have ever read on this forum. Period.

Thanks to all involved.

edit on 7/10/2014 by sputniksteve because: (no reason given)

edit on 7/10/2014 by sputniksteve because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 02:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Astr0

originally posted by: Tajlakz

Are these triangles and compounded shapes used for space exploration as well? If so, what do they use for thrust?


No they are not. They are however used to explore the destination.




Are. Is that supposed to be an "are" or a "will" or an "have"? Or is that too descriptive? Because the implications.
edit on 7/10/2014 by sputniksteve because: Put it to use afterall.



posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 03:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: clay2 baraka

It's been put into a lot of things.


like F117 aka 'one does not simply pilot this brick on his own'?



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 06:05 AM
link   
Just saw this post made tonight. Think it is related? Claims they saw a greenish/whitish ball of flames but it left a smoke trail. Don't remember hearing about a smoke trail in this Cali sighting though.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

twitter.com...



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 06:36 AM
link   
a reply to: sputniksteve

Oh look! A green meteor! Now why on earth would those start showing up? Haha.



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 07:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Certainly backs up the statement made in this thread that more sightings would occur over the coming weeks. If this is the same, which from the limited description seems that it could be. Certainly not for sure though.



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 07:08 AM
link   
a reply to: sputniksteve

Or....if there is a sudden increase in green meteor sightings, then it discredits the real sightings.

Not that they'd do that....

*cough*

Hi guys!



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 07:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

That's a good point. I hadn't thought of that. However would it be protocol to fake the green meteors or fake the reporting of seeing green meteors? How could they possibly fake green meteors? I can see it's pretty easy to make fake instagram, facebook posts, or threads etc.

Do those guys ever say Hi back?



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 07:50 AM
link   
a reply to: sputniksteve

Who said the meteors actually existed? Like you said, a Facebook post is easy. Who can say they saw what they said or not?

Well I'm not in Cuba, so they haven't said hi yet. Haha.



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Astr0



Well doesn't that look nice.

Is it real?
edit on 14-7-2014 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2014 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: grey580

Never mind, works now.

edit on 7/14/2014 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
134
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join