Weird California sighting

a reply to: Zaphod58

So no JJ Fad for Wichita? 😯

Bass sad now.

Wichita another subsonic plane , in fact the only high speed theoric plane may be the green lady.

a reply to: darksidius

As much as there is in this forum, we haven't even scratched the surface of what is and has been out there.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Zaphod58

Well last time i made a stink they were able to figure out where i was within 24 hours and arrange something awesome to fly down the center of my street lengthwise. Im pretty sure they already got my info. Just tell em i need 2 gigs per second download speed on my internet stat. Xhamsters been running really slow lately.

Come on....hook a bro up.

Well the military did invent the Internet for porn...

a reply to: Zaphod58

If high-supersonic/hypersonic green lady isn't scratching the surface then you've got my attention now.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: darksidius

As much as there is in this forum, we haven't even scratched the surface of what is and has been out there.

I have a feeling that we can´t scratch THIS surface without breaking it.

a reply to: Zaphod58
Whoaw !

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: darksidius

As much as there is in this forum, we haven't even scratched the surface of what is and has been out there.

===

Can we try this on for size:

1) 3D Printed drones with a Mesh-cage-like body containing
high-bypass turbofans mounted in gymbals to allow
omni-directional movement.

2) Small ISR Drones mounted in loitering cruise missiles
deployed near a target.

3) Peanut-shell shaped counter-rotating twin-prop
drones with 360-degree optical and IR pano-cameras.

4) Wedge-shaped really LOW flyers for LADP

5) Long pointy darts flying in the North Arctic

6) Sub-launched Manned VTOL aircraft

7) Single-Soldier Segway-style personal lift vehicle

8) two-fan and four-fan Flying Motorcycles

9) X-15 look-alike replacement for TSTO

10) Wide field of view cameras and screens
within manned window-less helicopter

11) Huge construction crane cage-like
8-rotor 500 tonne VTOL cargo lift vehicle

12) Drone-carrying Hercules with back ramp for
in-flight drone drop-off, re-call, capture and refueling.

13) Jet powered stealth Hercules replacement.

14) A380+ sized stealthy heavy lift
jet aircraft replacement for C5a Galaxy

15) Stealthy and HUGE blimp-based 1000 ton+ cargo heavy lifter

16) Flying Jeep

17) 250 ton+ Ekranoplane-like ground-effect Marine-corps/Navy
troops and trucks deployment vehicle

18) long Propane-tank shaped, aircraft carrier-sized deep-space craft?

....am I geting warm on any of them? ....

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: BigTrain

One, and more. It fulfills multiple missions, none of which are particularly sexy, all of which are particularly vital.

Hmm, I can think of ECM, JSTARS, and subhunting, which are semi-sexy, and maybe a universal "commlink" communication bus between diverse legacy and not-so-legacy protocols, which is super duper unsexy (ever heard of a sexy network engineer?).

On the assumption that the chinese jam or shoot down the DSCS.



Q: who opens up the cans of positronium?

a reply to: mbkennel

Positrons! They're IN YOU to give!

---

Now add the following secretive systems to above list:

19) Biomicry-based flapping wing drones
for short-range and silent survellience
mimicking the look of common birds
such as pigeons, seagulls and raptors.

20) Insectoid wall-sticking, climbing and flying
micro-drones (self-destructing) for search and
find missions.

21) Morphic-wing long-endurance high flyers that can
change to stubby large wings for slow flight and long
and thin for fast flight! (no-swing-wing!)

22) Deltoid blimps for high altitude, long-duration
as a high bandwidth communications hub.

23) Personal Self-powered Wingsuit platform
for near-area-of-operation infiltration and
deployment of SOF personnel from stealth Hercules.

How WARM or HOT! am I getting ???

Ok, let´s play Wichita then.
It was said that its appearance and the Texas bird was a show off for someone.
Both more or less at the same time.
Both with clear contrails. Strange for so sensitive prototypes at least they WANTED to be seen.
It was said Texas was directly related with LRSB.
Ergo Wichita must be also related, and i suspect it is an ultra low observable companion to the B21 (perfect triangular platform) and possibly uses plasma technology on the leading edges for range extension and/or turning without moving surfaces.
Possibly optionally manned and capable of:
ECM, communications, surveillance of air space around the bomber force (AWACS), damage assessment.
How they get this plasma not to interfere with apertures or stealth is beyond me.

I've been follwing ATS in the shadows for many years, the aircraft projects section has always been one of my favourites.

I'm just going to throw some #zer that I've read over the years to see if anything sticks.

Green Lady = codename: SB-3

Black Trianges = codename: Ghoul - with stealth tech 20 years in advance

a reply to: StargateSG7

Why would you do this to yourself.

Zaph will reply with a simple "YES" and walk away.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: StargateSG7

Why would you do this to yourself.

Zaph will reply with a simple "YES" and walk away.

====

I'm a glutton for punishment...AND...i'm working
on my secret mind-control computer virus that
will stealthily change the refresh rate of his display
on ATS allowing me to inject custom internet memes
into his visual cortex so that he will be FORCED to
reveal all the aerospace "Black Budget" secrets
he now carries to ATS and he won't remember
a thing he did ! ;-) :-)

Does that work as an explanation?

and of course I wonder WHO ELSE on here
knows if I'm getting a bit warm or REALLY HOT
in my assertions.

It also pushes others into further investigation
as to JUST HOW INSIDE my "Inside Sources" really are!
It allows to me to vet my own sources for accuracy
as a form of quality control.

P.S. Does it help to tell you I already HAVE a lot of secrets
including the entire 4216 item list of Secret Patents from
1962 and onwards ...... stored on my NON-internet
connected workstation?

;-) :-)

a reply to: StargateSG7

Be careful now..

DIA doesn't like it when you cross reference.

Remember the FARK Massacre.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: Fastmover

If you know who it was meant for, and look at the events going on around the time of the sightings you can clearly see the message was received.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: StargateSG7

Be careful now..

DIA doesn't like it when you cross reference.

Remember the FARK Massacre.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

===

I looooove cross-referencing....you (and the NSA, DIA, CIA, GCHQ,
MI6, MI5, CSIS, CSE, etc. etc) should SEE the treasure trove I have
of fully referenced Still Photos, Videos, Plans, Patents, etc detailing
all that fancy gear and concepts I've been able to show up as
"working now!" ...maybe I should just release it ALL !!!!!!!!! ;-) :-)

...

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Fastmover

If you know who it was meant for, and look at the events going on around the time of the sightings you can clearly see the message was received.

Can I take a guess that the intended message
recipients were BOTH China and Russia?

Which is probably WHY China suddenly boosted
RnD and low-initial rate production of their own version
of the KA-50 Sharc attack helicopter, New C17-like
cargo/troop lifters and new frigates/missile boats,
a Chinese version of LCAC's and Marine-corps
expeditionary-like ships to carry those LCAC's
...AND.... why Russia suddenly decided to give
an extra $150 Million to Sukhoi to push
extra-maneuverable forward-swept wing fighters!

AM I GETTING WARM ???

a reply to: StargateSG7

Not even close.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: StargateSG7

Not even close.

====

Not Even Close is a good enough answer for me....

but some oblique, offhand remarks and/or hints would also be nice too!