It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Weird California sighting

page: 11
134
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tajlakz

Are these triangles and compounded shapes used for space exploration as well? If so, what do they use for thrust?


No they are not. They are however used to explore the destination.




posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:17 PM
link   
So how did such a platform avoid detection, seeing as there are multitudinous stargazers?
Was it cloaked, and if so, how did it replicate the stars 'behind' it?



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: aorAki
So how did such a platform avoid detection, seeing as there are multitudinous stargazers?
Was it cloaked, and if so, how did it replicate the stars 'behind' it?


Its tipped nose down at the world and 'walks' the light around it back onto the path it was taking.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:23 PM
link   
^ So it's 'science fiction' made real, huh? that sure is some interesting technology.


This is quite old (over a decade)

Anti Grav

and if it was in the public consciousness then, what did they really have?


edit on 1-7-2014 by aorAki because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Astr0

Huh?



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Astr0

Good, I'm not the only one confused by that response. What is the destination?



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: aorAki
and if it was in the public consciousness then, what did they really have?


There is no 'anti gravity'.

These craft are in no way shape or form 'anti gravity' machines. They appear to defy gravity as they are neutrally buoyant or lighter than air, and have on-board systems that lift them / anchor them / guide them.

The air corridors are created and they zip along these which is where they appear to 'blink out of existence'. (they turn off all the lights and turn on active defence systems milliseconds after the jump starts)



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:35 PM
link   
"Neutrally-bouyant"?
"Lighter than air"?

That sounds like some pretty exotic technology and is consistent with your previous statement about them being 100 years ahead of anything else (bar the super=massive ships that are 100 years ahead of them).

I'm falling down this rabbithole and struggling to maintain any semblance of knowing what I'm talking about.

Anyway, here is another potential New Zealand link to all of this.
edit on 1-7-2014 by aorAki because: additional



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: aorAki
That sounds like some pretty exotic technology and is consistent with your previous statement about them being 100 years ahead of anything else (bar the super=massive ships that are 100 years ahead of them).
I'm falling down this rabbithole and struggling to maintain any semblance of knowing what I'm talking about.


When it all started, it was a small cadre of two nations. UK and USA. Then extra thought was needed, and soon, the nuclear boys rolled in (Oz and NZ has formidable intelligences amongst those green and dusty hills). Canada had the 'eureka' moment propulsion wise.

The entire programme was then sat under an umbrella, and every one, civilian and military, wears white.

Look at nuke boat routes and black triangle sightings. They over lay perfectly (ocean sightings). Why? because some of the craft re-up and re-fuel sat on the ocean. Others are using on-board laser comms to 'talk' to the boats.

The Nuke boat Commander just parks her up, lets off the six guys he thinks are SEALs or RM SBS, and away they swim as the Sub goes back on her way once the other team that's being replaced has swam in and docked.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Astr0

Is there a reason you placed 'anti-gravity' in quotes? In other words, are you ruling out the existence of any sort of gravitic technology, or only the idea of a repulsive force?



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Astr0

Would it be safe to say these are like flying submarines? Is that were they keep them most of the time when they aren't at altitude?
Seams like they would be easier to hide at sea than in a hanger somewhere.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 08:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sammamishman
Would it be safe to say these are like flying submarines? Is that were they keep them most of the time when they aren't at altitude?
Seams like they would be easier to hide at sea than in a hanger somewhere.


The smallest ones fold up around the core. Fit in a C-5.

As for under the ocean, it is just a matter of turning up the power a little to move the water. Hence why USO's around Puerto Rico don't sound off and kill sonar operators ears.

Also, now the habitats are fully in place, its rare to see or need to touch the ground at all bar gathering personell or taking SES to and fro.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Tajlakz
Is there a reason you placed 'anti-gravity' in quotes? In other words, are you ruling out the existence of any sort of gravitic technology, or only the idea of a repulsive force?


There are systems in use now that would make people say 'that's anti gravity'. They are silent, emit no gases, but can anchor a craft to a specific spot in the air as if it was a rock on a mountain.

This has been utilised many times over many generations of airframes, now its as perfected as we can get it. Runs off batteries too.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:20 PM
link   
Astro.... since youre telling us this. isnt this going to make us all targets of the NSA and CIA and MIB? Dont get me wrong I enjoy this stuff immensly and if given a NDA would sign just to see one,but i t makes y a think.

Also remember the active camoflage they developed at berkley using cameras that make it look like you are invisible is that cloacking tech a offshoot of that in use on the aircraft? Also what weapons are mounted on such crafts or for a lack of term "proto base stars" these craft link up with?



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa
Astro.... since youre telling us this. isnt this going to make us all targets of the NSA and CIA and MIB? Dont get me wrong I enjoy this stuff immensly and if given a NDA would sign just to see one,but i t makes y a think.


See my signature line? I'm tired of funerals and brave men and women taking secrets to the grave.

MiB are Scientific Experimentation Support, and they do what they do, but really they only go in if you have a trace of the skin, a photo recording showing HOW we get lifted people in and out, or explain the entire 'voices in the mind' used to persuade people to go to lonely spots at weird times. Then have missing time.


Also what weapons are mounted on such crafts or for a lack of term "proto base stars" these craft link up with?


Weapons? none. Its totally self defence suit only. Plasma balls and electric shocks. For visual, there is 'sparkle', a constant feed of energy sent out that reflects off the retina and thus can be detected to show who saw you and who is living in ignorant bliss.
At close range to deter humans, infrasound is emitted and that's enough to melt the hardest into pools of tears. Its nasty.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Astr0

I know this is a multi national effort but who's authority does this fall under. Does the elected gov. even know about any of this?



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

You may get your posts watched a little closer if you talk about this type of thing *cough*heyguys!*cough* but if you're not under an NDA and find out something, you're ok to talk about it. You MIGHT get a visit if you go into great detail about it, but that's as much to find your source as anything else.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Sammamishman

At least some of it, yes they are. There are quite a few dog and pony shows.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sammamishman
I know this is a multi national effort but who's authority does this fall under. Does the elected gov. even know about any of this?


Authority.

Interesting concept. Let me explain.

It started small, gathered up momentum, all under the overall Command of the United States Navy, However, each nation had two Officers in the chain of Command that could veto any use at all / any development at all if BOTH Officers from the same nation agreed to the veto, show a hand and say 'No, we are not doing that' so to speak. Its effective and honest.

So, Eleven Officers (Three from USN) around a table.

Then Political types said 'we want toys, lots of toys', so trickle down was started and for that, civilian companies were gifted 'things' to go play with and do what they wanted with.

However - Political types do know of it, so do top tier SF and Military types who have volunteered or been volunteered for duties.

The rub though - is we have an instructional sheet we are following and it is not for discussion. Its happening, its being followed, and after 50+ years the governments just wave a hand and say 'yeah, what ever'.



posted on Jul, 1 2014 @ 09:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
At least some of it, yes they are. There are quite a few dog and pony shows.


Where's my Goddam Coffee Boy?



new topics

top topics



 
134
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join