It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Weird California sighting

page: 108
134
<< 105  106  107    109  110  111 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: StargateSG7

originally posted by: yuppa
if Em was that dangerous we would al be dead already.


May i suggest a peer-reviewed, fully reproducible
Scientific experiment to check out whether EM is dangerous...take one sharp, all-metal knife and stick pointy part into a light socket while you touch something metal (and grounded) like a
sink or stainless steel fridge with your other
hand...i can quite assure you EM ( i.e. 60 hz)
Can be quite dangerous....as another test, please do stand in front of that smaller radar array running at 10 to 30 GHz and 2000 watts for
About ten minutes.... ;-)


Now youre just trolling. EM as in the FIELDS not DIRECT EXPOSURE. Sheesh. Just because I think the guy you believe in is a Hoaxer. Smh. If no one can re create his experiments hes a LIAR.




posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 11:29 AM
link   
I've been searching for this video nearly two weeks now on and off, could this be that fabled Green Lady?



I saw it, 6th-7th of August and was going to post it, figured I might as well put it here.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:45 PM
link   
That is one interesting video... sure doesn't look like a meteor. Wish we could tell the speed it was traveling?



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 12:51 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Interesting video, where did you see this



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: RAY1990

Interesting video, where did you see this


I was at my brothers just browsing youtube and happened to look up recent UFO's, it's not my video. As said I saw it and thought of this thread.

It's not the best quality but I believe it to be genuine.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 07:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Winterpain
That is one interesting video... sure doesn't look like a meteor. Wish we could tell the speed it was traveling?


Most North American NTSC video is 29.97 frames per second
(or 24 frames per second if you're in Film-Scan mode) and so
do the math in terms of measuring Arc-Distance from one
end of the sky in degrees and ESTIMATE approximate height
and you will get the general speed plus or minus an error factor.

Most high-speed craft such as the Green Lady fly somwhere
between at 70,000 to 95,000 ft during operational missions
and come in at around 60,000 ft when coming from oceans
into their continential US landing areas before they do
their large circular swoop-in for final landing.

So as a general guess at 70,000 to 90,000 feet, airspeed
should be about 4500 to 5500 MPH (they usually use Knots
or Nautical Miles for aircraft but I will covert to MPH here!)
and knock it down to 1600 MPH and below over the
continential US at 60,000 ft.

That just a VERY ROUGH ESTIMATE on my part.


edit on 2016/8/22 by StargateSG7 because: sp



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 07:44 PM
link   
You know what...nevermind
edit on 22-8-2016 by BASSPLYR because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:22 PM
link   
a reply to: StargateSG7

Math is great... but he is tracking with the camera in a black sky with no point of reference.. no offence, but I agree your estimate is very very Rough. That and we have no idea if the aircraft was cruising, accelerating, etc.

Same with height. Could be going up, down, etc. Also as we have no concrete proof this craft is even real, I doubt our guess on it's operation envelope would be very accurate. Just my opinion.
edit on 22-8-2016 by Winterpain because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Winterpain

My guess is surprisingly accurate.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

and we both know you're not going to share any of it. tease.



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Winterpain

My guess is surprisingly accurate.


As is my estimate too. But the green lady has two important altitudes she has to be mindful of. 😈



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Winterpain
a reply to: Zaphod58

and we both know you're not going to share any of it.


Where would be the fun in that?



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: BASSPLYR

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Winterpain

My guess is surprisingly accurate.


As is my estimate too. But the green lady has two important altitudes she has to be mindful of. 😈


===

Would that be 100 km high for the Karman line?

and for the Astronaut badge would that be 80 km high?

So we are talking about the Green Lady being an SSTO craft?

and if it's NOT those two lines of ceiling demarcation,
isn't there also a badge when you hit at least 100,000 ft?

I'm guessing here....give us greedy mice some cheese....


edit on 2016/8/22 by StargateSG7 because: sp



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR
You can fly anywhere but the ground or space..It s a lot more difficult to fly there



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 08:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Lucky charms?



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 09:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Winterpain
a reply to: StargateSG7

Math is great... but he is tracking with the camera in a black sky with no point of reference.. no offence, but I agree your estimate is very very Rough. That and we have no idea if the aircraft was cruising, accelerating, etc.

Same with height. Could be going up, down, etc. Also as we have no concrete proof this craft is even real, I doubt our guess on it's operation envelope would be very accurate. Just my opinion.


...

P.S. My GUESSTIMATE is based upon a nebulous "Internet Fact"
that the "Green Lady" is in fact a high altitude recon flyer and
NOT an SSTO (Single-Stage-to-Orbit) payload-delivery system
craft with scramjet and rocket-boost to orbit.

THEN it would go past 80km to 100km+ as a "ceiling" or low-orbit path.


edit on 2016/8/22 by StargateSG7 because: sp



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 09:37 PM
link   
a reply to: StargateSG7

Rumor has it its triangular. You got any renderings??!!??






😈
edit on 22-8-2016 by BASSPLYR because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 09:43 PM
link   
Naaah the Tr3b aint got the range ;-P



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 09:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: StargateSG7

Rumor has it its triangular. You got any renderings??!!??


===

Gimme 10 minutes and I'll get you one....



😈



posted on Aug, 22 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Blackfinger

You saying greenlady got a sexy set of legs?



new topics

top topics



 
134
<< 105  106  107    109  110  111 >>

log in

join