It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: Spider879
I understand the minstral thing in tne US.
But why should Europeans care of be affected by what stupid raceist americans did a few decades back?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Spider879
Actually, no. It just shows the double-standard. Look what happened when a celeb showed up at party dressed up as character from Orange It the New Black. The problem was that she happened to be white and the character happened to be black. They still blasted her for it. How is the movie any different?
I know I've made the same point you did about why it's considered racist, but I actually think it's ridiculous, too, like many others here. We should stop being captive to our history.
There is a clear difference between replicating a minstrel show and dressing up as a character. Why shouldn't my son be allowed to dress up as Samuel L. Jackson's version of Nick Fury if he wants to, up to and including darkening his face? If the kid across the street wants to play Tony Stark and whiten his face, more power to him. They're emulating characters, not mocking anyone's race.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: blupblup
I dont see the issue?
Black people exist and Asian people exist.
They are people.
Why not try to emulate them?
What if I want to go as samual L Jackson to fancy dress party?
Am I not good enough to portray and black person?
t is often considered offensive, because it can imply stereotyped caricature of black people as in minstrel shows, and later vaudeville.
Stereotypes embodied in the stock characters of blackface minstrels not only played a significant role in cementing and proliferating racist images, attitudes, and perceptions worldwide, but also in popularizing black culture.[6] In some quarters, the caricatures that were the legacy of blackface persist to the present day and are a cause of ongoing controversy.
www.blacknonbelieversofdetroit.org...
It’s quite difficult to continue a state of equanimity as you come across some of the pictures of costumes of blackface that have been floating around the internet. Apparently, the ugly state of our opinions of racial affairs keeps rearing its ugly head. Blackface was the makeup used by a non-black performer playing a black role. The role played is typically comedic or musical and usually is considered offensive.
“The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board agreed with our clients that the team’s name and trademarks disparage Native Americans,” Jesse Witten, the plaintiff’s attorney told Politico. “The Board ruled that the Trademark Office should never have registered these trademarks in the first place.”
~~~~~
“It is a great victory for Native Americans and for all Americans. We filed our petition eight years ago and it has been a tough battle ever since," said one of the petitioners, Amanda Blackhorse. "I hope this ruling brings us a step closer to that inevitable day when the name of the Washington football team will be changed.”