It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Just what would the world like us to do?

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 1 2004 @ 08:02 PM

Originally posted by devilwasp

Originally posted by KrazyIvan

and you think the liberal guy, who said hed do the same thing that the incumbent did, would make everything all better?

ahh i never said that please dont try and twist my words.
i simply stated that we are not happy about your choice of presidnet. i never made any comment on who to pick.

well do you have to live in his country? no. dont worry about it then.

posted on Dec, 2 2004 @ 08:48 AM

Originally posted by Majic

If it is capable of satisfying 51% or more of the criticism directed at America by all of its detractors, you win.

hmm nice target

As for limiting the scope to one field, such as economics or military, it is only fair to point out that doing so ignores the significant fact that satisfying complaints in one area often generates them in another. Thus a policy limited to one field could not be classified as logical and coherent.

yeah was just wondering if you mean what the military poilicy or economical policy is. the economic it will be difficult....i have no exsperience might need to call in an advisor. that ok?

If you are to address the problem in a manner suited to my challenge, you must do so under the same conditions the people of America are expected to address them: comprehensively.

fair enough

Attempting to do this will hopefully demonstrate why no one in human history has been able to accomplish it to date. Should you be the first, I might be able to hook you up with a very nice job. But only if you succeed.

well 51% is about the same ammount of people that voted for bush so i dunno.

posted on Dec, 2 2004 @ 09:11 AM

Originally posted by Frosty

- Nope, not my food nor my citizens. But that food was being delivered by means of US tax dollar, and I don't want to see food going to starving people in the hands of ruthless warloads, maybe you do? "The operation was successful in stopping the famine and saving an estimated 200,000 lives, as well as de-escalating the high-intensity civil war into low-level, local skirmishes."

yes under UN duristriction, which means it was a UN matter not US.
also i do not like war or death if you had noticed from other posts of mine.
low level local skirmishs , whats the limit to low level skirmishes? ones where only 1000 people get killed or less?
it wasnt a US matter it was a UN matter the US should have gotten UN support.

- I suppose if South Korea didn't want our help they would ask for our 30,000 troops to back off from the border and leave the country. Think they'd ask for that with a whack-job like Kim bordering them?

if they didnt want your help then you shouldnt give it plain and simple.
also those troops are UN if i am not correct since the korean war was a UN operation.

- Whether these weapons were supplied by us while he was in "compliance" (notice that word in quotations, a word that really hasn't been assosiated with Saddam and UN sanctions) with the CIA or by eskimos, part of his terms of surrender were to get rid of those weapons, and guess what? He never did.

ohh hoo really? care to show us evidence of these 45 min weapons?

It wasn't that Clinton didn't have the balls to do the right thing, it's that his balls were in someone's hand other than his wife's.

did this mean he was a bad guy? no he was a good pres but this proves he is human.

- Take a wild guess on how long those hostages were in Iranian terrorist hands, guess how many times Carter unsuccesful tried to "plea" with the Iranians to let them go, and guess on who's inaguration day they were released? If the leaders of the country are applauding the actions, you don't think it necessary to change their attitudes?

neceasarry to change thier attitudes? you sound like a school yard bully!
come on! its their attitude thier right to have it by changeing it you take away thier rights. mabye it was the right ethical thing to do but the doing the right thing isnt always the right thing to do.

- UN support? How long do we need to wait for that to come through? Plus I believe the UN has already proclaimed human rights violations in Columbia and has spent military aid on the region.

uhh wha? you are on the security council , part of the big 5. just get enough evidence and they will side with you.
also this human rights in columbia does this mean the whole UN is bad?
cause if this is your logic i can say the entire US military is bad because of the actions in korea,vietnam,germany,afgahnistan and iraq.

posted on Dec, 6 2004 @ 12:08 PM
I guess the challenge was not undertaken? Just wondering. Maybe because of the shift to politics at ats it was lost in the shuffle.

posted on Dec, 6 2004 @ 05:16 PM

Originally posted by just_a_pilot
I guess the challenge was not undertaken? Just wondering. Maybe because of the shift to politics at ats it was lost in the shuffle.

well i did start it but i am a bit busy at the moment.
doing school stuff, stupid school i hate you!
i did right up like 5 points when i got 5 mins in IT.

posted on Dec, 6 2004 @ 05:32 PM
Thanks DW. Just wondering if it got lost in the shuffle. Good luck in school! Study hard

new topics

top topics
<< 1  2   >>

log in