It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Osiris1953
Apparently Mr. Cheney doesn't realize that he is no longer relevant. The new "massive attack" will most likely be Cheney with a gun mistaking people's faces for squirrels.
A particularly disturbing report which aired on ABC News on Tuesday night indicated that fighters in Syria and Yemen are arming themselves with non-metallic explosive devices which could evade detection. Those fighters, many of whom are Western and may even have access to American passports, may be preparing attacks on the United States.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
Charleston doesn't make any sense.
Maybe a couple of decades ago when we still had a naval base there (now all you have is the brig and a weapons station much further up the river in Goose Creek).
It is a commercial port, but hitting other places along the East Coast would make more sense: NYC, Boston, Philly, DC, Norfolk (major naval bases there), Jacksonville Fl (again, naval bases), Miami....all those make much more sense for a hit to happen there as far as the East Coast is concerned.
Hitting along the Gulf Coast would make more sense too (oil refineries).
originally posted by: butcherguy
I hope they don't plan on nuking Washington, DC.
The fallout would really tend to ruin Chesapeake Bay seafood for me.
And saying the next attack will involve a nuke from some radical muslim/Islam group that snuggled it thru the border. ...