It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: aorAki
a reply to: AnuTyr
Well, youtube videos by dubious sources (proponents of biblical global floods etc) will never stack up against hard science, no matter how much you want to believe that they will.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: Hanslune
If this is true why have the 'tptb' allowed the internet to exist?
I'll take this one.
"Hey, man, because nothing causes more suspicion than active censorship! You can never shut down the information path to fight all the leaks because it's too expensive, but you can minimize the impact of the leaks. That's why there's so much disinformation. Show people the truth, but surround it with so many lies that they'll think the truth is a lie, too! It's the most efficient and effective way to hide things!"
How's that?
originally posted by: one4all
a reply to: Hanslune
They were footing the bill for all of the cerebral horsepower they need to run their con-jobs on a Global level.They needed a cheaper way to do business and with a little investing they developed an even better than cheap way,they found a FREE way.
They were discovering that they were undergunned and needed to think bigger than they were so they simply found a new way to harness Humanitys cumulative problem solving power by simply scalping whatever they need off of the internet.
Instead of 100,000 well paid high maintenance minds which had no chance of producing timely results ,they now have billions of people helping them solve their problems.Now they have 10,000 professional Data-Surfers picking the brains of HUMANITY 24/7/365.
Toss in the added benefit to them that we have WILLINGLY given up our BOOKS on nearly a Global level,replaced by easily embargoed digital data,and you have a scenario approaching rivaling the Dark Ages if the Net goes down Globally.[\quote]
Nope go to a library, the books are still there, pure digitalized and loss of all book is still generations away, you are also assuming there are tptb and they all think alike....and are evil...
originally posted by: aorAki
a reply to: Harte
Got me!
I just looked at the youtube link and saw "This segment is from the DVD "Mount St. Helens: Modern Day Evidence for the World Wide Flood" produced by Awesome Science Media. It is part of a series of documentaries in the "Flood Geology Series"." and that was enough for me, which I am watching now. Having watched it, I stand by my previous statement. So much cherry picking and so little hard science.
Also, the links I have supplied are good places to start for those with no- or little- understanding of the dating process.
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: tizza2k
Google the term Out of Place Artifacts / Out of time Artifacts and you will see a bunch more examples of items being dated back 100k years to millions of years.
Ah, well, if it's on Google or the internet than it must be true, right?
originally posted by: Murgatroid
originally posted by: AnuTyr
carbon dating is a joke.
What few realize is that there is something FAR more serious going on than just a joke.
Science has become nothing but a huge mind control OP with a stealth agenda.
Mainstream academia has been completely taken over and used as a mind control tool against the masses.
Science is now being used to cover up the truth about the real history of the Earth.
"The model of human prehistory built-up by scholars over the past two centuries is sadly and completely wrong, and a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control. ...they demonstrate a systematic destruction of proofs that show another reality than that the official story. Falsifications and even destruction of such proofs has been common for more than two hundred years." LINK
"...the Illuminati eventually controlled the science departments in all colleges and institutions of higher learning. The plan was to stifle scientific knowledge and then twist what was left to fit the science they wanted the people to believe. They accomplished this by adopting new rules in regards to scientific research.
Secret Societies - Who Controls Knowledge?
In 1990, samples of various dinosaur bones were submitted for Carbon-14 dating to the University of Arizona’s department of geosciences’ laboratory of isotope geochemistry. Bones from an Allosaurus and an Acrocanthosaurus were among those sent to the university’s testing facilities to undergo a “blind” dating procedure (which means that the technicians performing the tests did not know that the bones had come from dinosaurs). Not realizing that the samples were from dinosaurs prevented “evolutionary bias”, and helped ensure that the results were as accurate as possible (within the recognized assumptions and limits of the C-14 dating method).
On the official stationery of the University of Arizona—a copy of the test results for the Allosaurus bones records amazingly that the oldest C-14 date assigned to those bones was a mere 16,120 years (and only 23,760 years for the Acrocanthosaurus fossils; see Dahmer, et al., 1990). Both dates are a far cry from the millions of years that evolutionists suggest should be assigned to dinosaur fossils. What really kills me about this admission is that the Darwinists are always howling about 'peer review'. So, when we give them truly unbiased peer review, in their very own labs nonetheless, they fall flat on their face. www.philadelphiaspeaks.com...
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: tizza2k
Google the term Out of Place Artifacts / Out of time Artifacts and you will see a bunch more examples of items being dated back 100k years to millions of years.
Ah, well, if it's on Google or the internet than it must be true, right?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: tizza2k
Google the term Out of Place Artifacts / Out of time Artifacts and you will see a bunch more examples of items being dated back 100k years to millions of years.
Ah, well, if it's on Google or the internet than it must be true, right?
I'm sorry but please point out where I stated if its on Google it must be true. You really need to get off this kick of putting words in peoples mouths.
As to authenticity its up to the individual doing the reading / research to decide if its real, not real, or something in the middle.
The manner in which science has decided to suppress any information that does not meet the "story" that has been put together is appalling. Has it ever occurred to you that science might just be wrong in some of these cases? I mean waay back in the day the wisest people decided the Earth was the center of the universe, that Kings were in fact Gods / appointed by God, that the Earth was flat and that sailing to far would result in falling off the edge, etc.
Can you tell me where in Egyptian history it discusses the Sphinx, who was behind it and why? Maybe we can ask scientists about the water erosion on the Sphinx and ask why they keep denying that's what it is?
Or how scientists told us the Coelacanth was extinct.
Antikythera mechanism?
Baghdad Batteries?
Mayan hieroglyphs / small models of Dinosaurs.
Piri Reis Map?
Based on the track record I don't think we should be so quick to write something off.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: tizza2k
Google the term Out of Place Artifacts / Out of time Artifacts and you will see a bunch more examples of items being dated back 100k years to millions of years.
Ah, well, if it's on Google or the internet than it must be true, right?
I'm sorry but please point out where I stated if its on Google it must be true. You really need to get off this kick of putting words in peoples mouths.
As to authenticity its up to the individual doing the reading / research to decide if its real, not real, or something in the middle.
The manner in which science has decided to suppress any information that does not meet the "story" that has been put together is appalling. Has it ever occurred to you that science might just be wrong in some of these cases? I mean waay back in the day the wisest people decided the Earth was the center of the universe, that Kings were in fact Gods / appointed by God, that the Earth was flat and that sailing to far would result in falling off the edge, etc.
Can you tell me where in Egyptian history it discusses the Sphinx, who was behind it and why? Maybe we can ask scientists about the water erosion on the Sphinx and ask why they keep denying that's what it is?
Or how scientists told us the Coelacanth was extinct.
Antikythera mechanism?
Baghdad Batteries?
Mayan hieroglyphs / small models of Dinosaurs.
Piri Reis Map?
Based on the track record I don't think we should be so quick to write something off.
I'm sorry but please point out where I stated if its on Google it must be true. You really need to get off this kick of putting words in peoples mouths.
Google the term Out of Place Artifacts / Out of time Artifacts and you will see a bunch more examples of items being dated back 100k years to millions of years.
As to authenticity its up to the individual doing the reading / research to decide if its real, not real, or something in the middle.
The manner in which science has decided to suppress any information that does not meet the "story" that has been put together is appalling.
Has it ever occurred to you that science might just be wrong in some of these cases?
Can you tell me where in Egyptian history it discusses the Sphinx, who was behind it and why? Maybe we can ask scientists about the water erosion on the Sphinx and ask why they keep denying that's what it is?
Google the term Out of Place Artifacts / Out of time Artifacts and you will see a bunch more examples of items being dated back 100k years to millions of years.
originally posted by: tizza2k
I was sent this and I thought it would interest alot of you guys :-)
Sorry in advance if this has already been posted.
In June 1936 Max Hahn and his wife Emma were on a walk beside a waterfall near to London, Texas, when they noticed a rock with wood protruding from its core. They decided to take the oddity home and later cracked it open with a hammer and a chisel. What they found within shocked the archaeological and scientific community. Embedded in the rock was what appeared to be some type of ancient man made hammer.
A team of archaeologists analysed and dated it. The rock encasing the hammer was dated to more than 400 million years old. The hammer itself turned out to be more than 500 million years old. Additionally, a section of the wooden handle had begun the metamorphosis into coal. The hammer’s head, made of more than 96% iron, is far more pure than anything nature could have achieved without assistance from relatively modern smelting methods.
Pictures and more are via this link :-
www.maltanow.com.mt...
As to authenticity its up to the individual doing the reading / research to decide if its real, not real, or something in the middle.
The manner in which science has decided to suppress any information that does not meet the "story" that has been put together is appalling.
Has it ever occurred to you that science might just be wrong in some of these cases?
Can you tell me where in Egyptian history it discusses the Sphinx, who was behind it and why? Maybe we can ask scientists about the water erosion on the Sphinx and ask why they keep denying that's what it is?