It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: Rex282
originally posted by: Moresby
a reply to: Prezbo369
Consider this equation:
A + B = C+D
Now solve for the value of "D".
.
I understand the point you are trying to make however this argument does not prove it because I can solve this problem an infinite amount of ways.Here's just one.
1+4=2+3
D=3
Oh, c'mon, you know that's not the solution. I don't think even people teaching the "Common Core" would accept that as a solution. Well, maybe them.
In algebraic equations you need ....
Oh, I'm not going to do that. You went to High School, you understand how algebraic equations work. You were just being all contrary and Internety on me.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
Based on this description Atheism is then a religion. Atheist don't claim knowledge, they only believe there isn't a God. A belief is taken on faith.
Agnostics do not take anything on faith. They truly lack religion of any sorts.
You answered your own question imo. The difference is one is a religion and one is the lack of all religion because they lack any type of faith.
Agnostics do not take anything on faith.
The gnostic atheist has a dogmatic, fundamentlist position that would be clearly be an active belief system.
I was trying to describe the difference between a gnostic and an agnostic atheist. I believe that the vast majority of atheists (like myself) are agnostic and not dogmatic with their certainty.
The majority that I was referring to was about atheists only. Religion is exclusive to humans, I believe, only because of our advanced development; as humanity advances, the need for religion should decline.