It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Moresby
No, an agnostic holds that the existence of god is inherently unknowable. So they can neither believe, nor disbelieve. An atheist disbelieves. Two different concepts.
originally posted by: ArtemisE
a reply to: DISRAELI
In large part that's because of the BS talking point that atheism is A religion. Some how they convinced people that atheists KNOW there isn't a God as much as the religiouso believe there is one.... .......
originally posted by: Rex282
Yes atheism is not "A" religion.....however atheism is "religion" because it is BELIEF(i.e something not known) in some peoples "Belief System".The same with agnosticism religion ...it is just belief.Neither are "A" religion only a part of someones "religion".
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: Moresby
No, an agnostic holds that the existence of god is inherently unknowable. So they can neither believe, nor disbelieve. An atheist disbelieves. Two different concepts.
They lack a belief in god/s.....just like atheists do.
They didn't say yes when asked if they believe in god/s, therefore they're atheists.
originally posted by: Moresby
No, they are in an in-between state. They neither believe, nor disbelieve. That is an entirely acceptable philosophical position to hold. And that's where agnostics choose to hang their hats.
It seems you have a very binary view of the world. So this is a hard concept for you to grasp.
But the world isn't binary. And agnostics hold a non-binary view on the existence of God. It's a perfectly credible position to hold, whether you understand it or not.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: Prezbo369
Yeah, but sticking with a negative implies one sides with that negative claim... I think there is a lack of information to reach a definitive conclusion, either way (or sideways)... thus "agnostic."
If you're really pushing for definitive labels, you're gonna be butt sore in this world.
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: Moresby
No, an agnostic holds that the existence of god is inherently unknowable. So they can neither believe, nor disbelieve. An atheist disbelieves. Two different concepts.
They lack a belief in god/s.....just like atheists do.
They didn't say yes when asked if they believe in god/s, therefore they're atheists.
No, they are in an in-between state. They neither believe, nor disbelieve. That is an entirely acceptable philosophical position to hold. And that's where agnostics choose to hang their hats.
It seems you have a very binary view of the world. So this is a hard concept for you to grasp.
But the world isn't binary. And agnostics hold a non-binary view on the existence of God. It's a perfectly credible position to hold, whether you understand it or not.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: Rex282
Yes atheism is not "A" religion.....however atheism is "religion" because it is BELIEF(i.e something not known) in some peoples "Belief System".The same with agnosticism religion ...it is just belief.Neither are "A" religion only a part of someones "religion".
Is not believing in Ewoks also "religion"?
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: Moresby
No, they are in an in-between state. They neither believe, nor disbelieve. That is an entirely acceptable philosophical position to hold. And that's where agnostics choose to hang their hats.
They lack the belief in a god, and if you do not posses a belief in a god, you're not a theist but an atheist.
Is there an in between 'state' for stamp collecting? or is it that you either collect stamps or you don't?
It seems you have a very binary view of the world. So this is a hard concept for you to grasp.
This issue is completely binary, you either believe or you don't, you either accept the claims made by theists or you don't.
But the world isn't binary. And agnostics hold a non-binary view on the existence of God. It's a perfectly credible position to hold, whether you understand it or not.
To claim to be an agnostic on the existence of a god but not atheist, is a nonsensical position to hold. Agnostics have not accepted the claims made by god and they lack the belief in a god....therefore they're atheists....
originally posted by: Moresby
What's nonsensical is your inability to understand a very simple concept.
An agnostic doesn't believe the existence of God is knowable, so he chooses to neither believe nor disbelieve in God. He cannot stand with team atheist, because they disbelieve in God. And he does not disbelieve in God.
It's about knowledge. It's not about belief. The agnostic does not know, because he cannot know. And because he cannot know, he can neither believe nor disbelieve.
The agnostic feels that the question doesn't work. It's like being asked what's behind a locked door for which there is no key.
The atheist says there's nothing behind that door. The religious person says God is behind that door. But the agnostic says I have no way of knowing what's behind that door. So I cannot side with either of you.
originally posted by: Rex282
yes ... because it is impossible to "prove Ewoks don't exist you can only believe they don't.You can't even prove you exist.Your whole life is based in "belief" of "your" Belief System religion.Only true facts can be known...1+1=2
originally posted by: Moresby
a reply to: Prezbo369
You seem to believe the inability to answer a question implies a specific answer.
That makes no logical sense.
And the agnostic is not merely saying he cannot answer. He gives a reason he cannot answer. The answer is unknowable.
Consider this equation:
A + B = C+D
Now solve for the value of "D".
Of course, you cannot do that. The answer is unknowable. There isn't enough information there to solve for "D".
Now along comes a person who says, "D = 1". And then along comes another person who says, "I disbelieve that D = 1."
There is no way to logically argue that by being unable to solve that equation you are either agreeing or disagreeing with either of these people.
You are not answering the question, because you cannot answer the question. And there is no process to divine an answer from your inability to answer. You simply cannot answer given the information before you.
originally posted by: Rex282
originally posted by: Moresby
a reply to: Prezbo369
Consider this equation:
A + B = C+D
Now solve for the value of "D".
.
I understand the point you are trying to make however this argument does not prove it because I can solve this problem an infinite amount of ways.Here's just one.
1+4=2+3
D=3