It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pirhanna
a reply to: WhiteAlice
I spelled at a college graduate level by the time I was 8.
Just sayin.
Also, Occam's razor is the worst kind of razor. You can't even shave with it, much less win a fair debate. And this isn't even a debate - at this point people are chiming in with data (their memories). So, you really haven't disproved anything. We aren't even to where we could posit a valid hypothesis to disprove yet!
Yes and no. As far as I can tell, it was always stain on the books, but it wasn't always stain elsewhere because people have been misreading what's on the books for a long time.
originally posted by: Druid42
IF it was always stain, there'd be no question or reason for this thread. People would just accept it. Yep, that's the way it's always been spelled. That's not what we are finding, and that is the premise I'm following.
originally posted by: pirhanna
originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: thisguy27
Like, what if the people who remember the -stein way are different than those who remember it as -stain
They are different. The ones who remember it as Berenstein are wrong. Berenstain is correct. I always thought that was a weird spelling but that's the way it was.
Did you read the old sourcing documents posted?
There are like 6 of them posted towards the bottom of page 1, old newspapers, and they refer to the books as Berenstein.
originally posted by: Boswell
a reply to: Druid42
it was an example of one of the many sites that misspell the word in the listing while the book spells the word Berenstain.
i have no trouble agreeing that many people think it was Stein, i've mentioned why they think it's Stein and a few members have shared opinions as to why so many may think it's Stein.
the problem with arguing that a transition of some sort is incomplete/botched is that you will need to find evidence of a transition - when did it begin? how many people has it affected? what other aspects of reality have been influenced?etc. etc. you can tell me, "these are things we may never know" but i would refuse to accept that answer because this very scenario, for you, is evidence of a transition and so there will be many, many more transition scenarios for you to find.
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
originally posted by: pirhanna
originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: thisguy27
Like, what if the people who remember the -stein way are different than those who remember it as -stain
They are different. The ones who remember it as Berenstein are wrong. Berenstain is correct. I always thought that was a weird spelling but that's the way it was.
Did you read the old sourcing documents posted?
There are like 6 of them posted towards the bottom of page 1, old newspapers, and they refer to the books as Berenstein.
How about a better source, like, say, the books themselves? Do a simple Amazon or eBay search, and see the actual covers. They ALL say BerenstAIN. All of them. New, old, all. I have OWNED many, many of these books, some from the 60's, and it's always been "-stain".
originally posted by: Druid42
...a rift in the space-time field brought about by whatever means, and in that case, in the near future such anomalies will be easily detectable, and comparable, by rational people everywhere. If that is the case, such anomalies would become widespread and then the rift could be more accurately predicted, unless, of course, the very fabric of space time is being unwoven, by perhaps, mankind's consistent exploration of reality is made of.