Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Firefighter chases dog and both are missing 411?

page: 57
83
<< 54  55  56   >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 3 2014 @ 11:05 PM
link   
a reply to: WanDash

Why would Herdmans death be explained for the most part. As an innocent
occurance, turned tragic story. That just so happens to parallel a certain
criteria, concatenated by an author in his recent best selling non fiction
mystery? But seal the case?

This case is sealed why?

Because there is an element to the story that is being kept hidden.

They tossed the drug thing in to sell it to the public and squash it.
Then moved away from the story quickly. Dropped it like a cheap suit.
Which explains perfectly why a firefighter doing dope isn't investigated,
charged or even reprimanded by his dept. In my opinion we've done
very well here Wan. The only thing we don't have? Is what thier hiding.
And that bugs me.




posted on Dec, 4 2014 @ 12:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
Why would Herdmans death be explained for the most part. As an innocent
occurance, turned tragic story. That just so happens to parallel a certain
criteria, concatenated by an author in his recent best selling non fiction
mystery? But seal the case?

...This case is sealed why?

...Because there is an element to the story that is being kept hidden.


Yep...
Could be protecting "sensitive" information -
Could be the muscle of a secret society -
Could be deals with aliens or the devil...
But - as you say - something is being kept from the light.


...The only thing we don't have? Is what thier hiding.
And that bugs me.




posted on Dec, 7 2014 @ 11:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
…there is an element to the story that is being kept hidden.

If that is true, then – Who is doing the hiding?

If not Byars - - Who?
…the Sheriff? – the Fire Brigade? – City Hall? – National Parks / Forestry / Wildlife /…Services?

It would have to be hidden at or near the source…high-enough up the chain of information, that only 1, 2 or a handful of people were privy…and all of them stood to lose something, should the circle break.

Otherwise - the implication would be multi-disciplinary collusion on the story/issues…which would (imo) raise a host of other questions --
-- such as… Who would be in position to orchestrate such…complicity?
--- someone/something with power over each/all of the colluders…to purchase blindness &/or assistance.



posted on Dec, 14 2014 @ 03:24 AM
link   
a reply to: WanDash




If that is true, then – Who is doing the hiding?


Okay, not sure were on the same page here so, for me,
the fact that I did confirm for myself, that the case was sealed.
When I called and spoke to the deputy? Does make it true
that something is being hidden. That may not be the case for you
and I understand that. But as far as I'm concerned the only reason
to seal a case like this is to hide something. So for me there isn't
any, " If this is true?".



posted on Dec, 14 2014 @ 09:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
...Okay, not sure were on the same page here so, for me,
the fact that I did confirm for myself, that the case was sealed.
When I called and spoke to the deputy? Does make it true
that something is being hidden. That may not be the case for you
and I understand that. But as far as I'm concerned the only reason
to seal a case like this is to hide something. So for me there isn't
any, " If this is true?".

...

IMO – unless there is some arcane law on the books that is so rarely used that we don’t have a “name” for it…behind “why” the case is sealed…something is being hidden.

If some arcane law, so rarely used that we don’t have a “name” is behind this seal…who needed that dug up?
Who was told to find some law to support the sealing?
If not – why isn’t the law/reason for the sealing included in the announcement…that it was sealed…?
I realize that we only heard/read of the announcement, through your report…so, there are no official published announcements that I am aware of, and thus, they cannot be accused or questioned in said regards, with no record of the decision/announcement.
Would be nice to know that this “position/stance” of Law Enforcement is recorded…somewhere.
You didn’t happen to record the conversation…did you?



posted on Dec, 15 2014 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: WanDash




You didn’t happen to record the conversation…did you?


Yeah that's a negative. But I bet they did! If I'd have known
I might hear anything like that I sure would have. But I did
provide the numbers for anyone else who wants to check
it out. In thread. I could even make another inquiry from my
cell this time.



posted on Dec, 15 2014 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs
There is one thing I hate, in this world ---- talking on the phone.
I despise it. I abhor it. Lost a number of jobs, because of it.
But - if no-one-else will - I will do the honors. It's that important (to me)...seeing how I hate/love dangling loose ends.



posted on Dec, 17 2014 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: WanDash

I would love to see what you come up with because there's
no way you hate phone conversations more than me. And
I'll even bet you're better at them than I. If you need help with
the numbers or anything Wan, leme know? But do call and
see what you can find out. At this point, every piece of
info, no matter how seemingly unimportant, could be the
key to the whole puzzle esse.



posted on Dec, 17 2014 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs
I will do so, Randy
I probably won't record the conversation, but, there will be two separate witnesses with no ties past friendship on ATS.
Presuming I get the same story given to you.
Will let you know!




posted on Dec, 19 2014 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: WanDash

Cool baby.






top topics



 
83
<< 54  55  56   >>

log in

join