It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Securing the Texas/Mexico border begins

page: 3
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 08:47 AM
link   
And here comes the threats from Obama to shut down these operations in 3...2...1...
I'm telling you that Obama is building an army with these illegals. We WILL be fighting them for our own property before too long. He's amassing this army to further destroy this nation in his jihad against the US.




posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 08:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: TDawgRex
a reply to: stutteringp0et

There is always a bug in the back of my paranoid mind that this surge of children will result in a uprising eventually in the near future. They are not all Mexicans after all.

I wonder if their families are being threatened and the children, not knowing any better are sent out to do others bidding because of fear for their families.


I was going to post the same thing,this isn't all about votes, Obama and his cohorts are letting the jihadist in before his term is up, they are already in high positions of power within the military and government



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 09:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Skorpy
Another option would be to annex about half of Mexico. and then break it up into around 10 states turn the USA into a 60 states. That would create enormous business opportunities. It would save our economy.

Why can't we do this? Russia did and got away with it.

...............we could do this, and honestly there is nothing anyone could do about it.

Actually, we could "take" Canada and all of south America in less than a year, turn them all into states, and most of the folks involved would be greatful, how would the Canadians feel? they did nothing to deserve being conquered.

How about all of latin America?

We would all assimilate in a generation, but what we be?

Coquestadors?

Tyrants?

oligarchs?

technocrats?



No this isnt the way, if America wanted domination by empire we could have and would have done so.

Instead we conquered and freed all the peoples of the Earth....well not us, WE as in us and our allies.

Are we right in doing so is one of the biggest questions.

IMHO, hell to the NO.

This doesnt make me right though.

I am smart enough to know I dont know some things.


As such somethings dont need to be known by me



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: oblvion

Seriously.

Get some help dude.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: oblvion

Sounds good. Get all the A10s back, fly the border. One second burst in front of the group. Lol

The Apache can fire a warning missile or some cannon.

Hell, you have so many awesome killing machines, just put on a show!

ETA Kill the drug cartels even if its friendly fire ... with your Government who knows.

P


Maybe Australia can send us some convicts to protect the border,
I know you guys got some pretty wiry fellows that would be up for some oi oi oi immigrant head smashing



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 09:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Skorpy
Another option would be to annex about half of Mexico. and then break it up into around 10 states turn the USA into a 60 states. That would create enormous business opportunities. It would save our economy.

Why can't we do this? Russia did and got away with it.


I gotta give you a star for original thinking.
Never heard that solution put forward before.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 09:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Asktheanimals

originally posted by: Skorpy
Another option would be to annex about half of Mexico. and then break it up into around 10 states turn the USA into a 60 states. That would create enormous business opportunities. It would save our economy.

Why can't we do this? Russia did and got away with it.


I gotta give you a star for original thinking.
Never heard that solution put forward before.


Right, i might be up for it if they could manage what we got now.
Mexico would be wise to let the us help them battle the cartels,
the thing is, the cartels pay their politicians and police's salary,
so it is in mexico's best interest
to keep things like they are. The cartels are a institution now,
their to stay, and if mexico pushes to hard against them,
they know the hell that will be brought down.
Mexico is arresting the mules and the street level
no bodies to save face. You don't think they know where the kingpins are?
I'm sure they know and I bet they are actually protecting them.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Happy1
a reply to: stutteringp0et

ALL of these illegal immigrants should be directly shipped to democratic strongholds, and they should be billed for all expenses - then let the constituents vote out their idiotic leaders - once they have to pay for all the "welfare" and have to deal with all the crime, and have to live with all the contagious diseases these people are bringing in with them.

Let me see - CA, WA, OR - or their "democratic stronghold cities - IL, I should say the city of Chicago - the city of Detroit - the city of Cinncinati - and let's not forget the liberal cities of the northeast -

Let those idiots use their taxpayer dollars to house, clothe, feed, and medicate these illegals -

The catholic church seems to have a lot of "wealth" too --


Illegals tend to work for large companies including farming companies. Places like Walrmart get pretty often. Do you know what parties these big companies give money to? The GOP. Did you ever wonder why when the GOP has power nothing gets done at the border? Obama has wasted more money derporting more people than any other President. It does not make a difference because they will always come because their will always be jobs and no party will stop them because they are a vital part of the economy, like it or not. For over the first 200 years of the US history nobody bother with the border beyong keeping out illigal items like booze during prohibition. Everybody else could come and go as the pleased, once you got here you could stay. Then suddenly in the 80s people needed someone to blame the bad economy on so they picked illegals who suddenly were be deported just for being here. The US then began spending more and more money on the border and kicking them out. The US border is massive. It will never be secured, the entire military is not big enough and then companies will just bring them in by air or sea. The same companies that pay the people who give lip service to stopping illegals but, then do nothing about it. Much like the war on drugs, the war on ilegals is complete waste of money.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 11:09 AM
link   
Securing the Texas/Mexico border begins

Enter Eric Holder to sue, and stop Perry.

Crying how 'racist' stopping illegal immigration is.

YOU WAIT !.

Remember when they went after Jan Brewer for trying to secure that border ?
edit on 19-6-2014 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 11:18 AM
link   
Good for Gov. Perry, he is the only one with the best interest of the children

and the US citizens in mind.

What the Obama administration has caused is not a "dream" amnesty - it is an exploitation nightmare amnesty.


What Biden wants is to steal children from other countries so that the US won't go into the type of decline Japan is in.

I have a theory why Joe Biden says we need lots more of these children flooding into the US.

Biden said a "constant, substantial stream of immigrants" is important to the American economy, urging citizenship for immigrants living in the U.S. illegally.


The US is having a depopulation crisis with the low birth rate. Look what has happened to xenophobic Japan because of their even lower birth rate. ALL industrialized countries have a depopulation problem. Even Mexico is only .01% above replacement rate. The only countries without a depopulation problem also have a very high mortality rate. We are very close to having a world wide depopulation. The Muslim countries are also having a depopulation problem because fathers who love their daughters are not forcing them to marry and a city is being built in the middle east that will just be for women who do not want to marry.



The flood is being encouraged to exploit the "children". If the average age is 12-14 that means half are older than 14, uneducated, can't speak English and will be thrown out on their own very, very, soon. Ripe to pay social security taxes, and work the dirty low paying jobs by the thousands.

To avert the coming Social Security crisis the US needs lots of "young blood" to pay the bills and to do the jobs that children in the US are refusing to do.


Why don't people have children now in industrialized countries?

People are now quite aware of the financial and emotional cost of being parents.

The government is also threatening parents at an alarming rate, taking children away for reasons that have nothing to do with real abuse or neglect, causing parents to fear, and non-parents to think twice about having children. There are articles about all of these issues all over the media.

Also, if you pay attention, there are lots and lots of new popular articles about the joy of childlessness.

But the US needs children to survive with a rapidly aging population.

These children are so prone to be fecund that they are humping like rabbits in the border patrol cages. You can't read an article about these children without hearing about this problem.


If these children are kept uneducated and marginalized; they won't have the knowledge of the hardships ;when people without an education ; don't who know the language of the country they are living in; have lots of children. Another temporary boon, until the 2nd generation grows up and assimilates.

Also, the US has convinced parents that all children need a good education and a college education.

Therefore, US children don't want the jobs that previously the uneducated took, manual labor that doesn't take much education - and these jobs are much much harder than the jobs that require education.

Exploitation of these children is what the powerful and the administration are really wanting to do.

As I said in another thread: We need to stop the exploitation of children from south of the border and send them back to their families in the country from which they came. Yes, a new wave of a younger generation to support the older generation who refuses to have children. Also a new wave of cheap uneducated labor. Notice the average age of the "children" according to border patrol is between 12-14, in a very few years they'll be left to fend for themselves providing tons of cheap labor for nasty jobs. If for no other reason we need to send all our troops to the border to save the children; by sending them home before the US exploits them.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 11:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

My ancestors came over here 4 generations ago, on boats, the legal way. Nobody is talking about stopping legal immigration. We are, however, interested in stopping the flood of illegals which affect our jobs, wages, public services, crime rates, school systems, health care - the list goes on.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stormdancer777

originally posted by: TDawgRex
a reply to: stutteringp0et

There is always a bug in the back of my paranoid mind that this surge of children will result in a uprising eventually in the near future. They are not all Mexicans after all.

I wonder if their families are being threatened and the children, not knowing any better are sent out to do others bidding because of fear for their families.


I was going to post the same thing,this isn't all about votes, Obama and his cohorts are letting the jihadist in before his term is up, they are already in high positions of power within the military and government

You have any proof of this? Just like everyone crying the Muslim Brotherhood is in our government but never backs it up with proof.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 12:26 PM
link   
It's about time Perry got off his lazy ass and remembered he was Governor and it was in his authority to do this. He should have tried to solve this like he did with the drought gather a bunch of people together and pray for the border to close itself.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 12:51 PM
link   
a reply to: buster2010


originally posted by: buster2010
It's about time Perry got off his lazy ass and remembered he was Governor and it was in his authority to do this. He should have tried to solve this like he did with the drought gather a bunch of people together and pray for the border to close itself.


Right, because something can be done to relieve a drought...other than pray. Recent rainstorms have brought reservoir levels up (not full though), so maybe he was heard.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: oblvion

And all those countries don't have the constitution or the bill of rights that we have....
Seems that is another small piece of info left out of your plan.
I find it amazing you are comparing what Iran or Russia would do for their immigration problems to justify your plans of bombing and killing the ones that try and come over
edit on thThu, 19 Jun 2014 13:24:29 -0500America/Chicago620142980 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Asktheanimals

"Annexing mexico" - and canada - that's what the NWO - UN one world gov't is all about - and probably this whole flood of humanity is attempting to bring forward -

Old idea - see the 10 "unions" of the NWO/UN plan.

They need to destroy america and our freedoms -specifically the 2nd amendment - before they can get people to live like 3rd world citizens around the world -

See also agenda 21, and how they are implementing it here in america.

I think most of us can agree, it's not these "kids" fault - this is our gov't's fault. Niether "party" has done anything to protect our national security in this reagard.

CIA drug running?



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 01:41 PM
link   
The White House is incompetent and the dumping of illegals is intentional.”
www.washingtontimes.com...
DHS to Pay For Illegal Immigrants to be Escorted Into U.S.
www.fbo.gov... bc917a46d6709d38bd&tab=core&tabmode=list&

Gang Members Among Immigrants Surrendering to Border Patrol
www.krgv.com...

What will it take?



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777

I believe it will take the american public waking up and realizing the real agenda of career politicians -

and having the vote actually counted - not manufactured by voting machines and computer programs.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: stutteringp0et
a reply to: buster2010


originally posted by: buster2010
It's about time Perry got off his lazy ass and remembered he was Governor and it was in his authority to do this. He should have tried to solve this like he did with the drought gather a bunch of people together and pray for the border to close itself.


Right, because something can be done to relieve a drought...other than pray. Recent rainstorms have brought reservoir levels up (not full though), so maybe he was heard.

That was last year and the drought just got worst.



posted on Jun, 19 2014 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: buster2010

Remember, I'm the OP. I actually live in Texas, and started this thread because this affects me directly - much like the drought.

Although we're still in a drought, recent rainstorms have brought a lot of water back to our lakes and reservoirs. Two years ago it was bad - My family sold all of our cattle and I didn't mow my pasture or yard because there was no rainfall. Last year we got enough rain to end the hay shortage and this year is greener/wetter still.

Ranchers can now pasture their livestock and are no longer forced to purchase feed hay from neighboring states. My neighbors are keeping cattle in my pasture, and I'm able to tether my goats to keep my yard maintained. The situation is better.
edit on 19-6-2014 by stutteringp0et because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join