snips from the OP link:
... Iraq is at risk of falling to a radical Islamic terror group and Mr. Obama is talking climate change. Terrorists take control of more territory
and resources than ever before in history, and he goes golfing. He seems blithely unaware, or indifferent to the fact, that a resurgent al Qaeda
presents a clear and present danger to the United States of America.
...Drawing an arc with his finger from Raqqa province in northern Syria to Anbar province in western Iraq, he said, "They will control this
territory. Al Qaeda is building safe havens and training camps here. Don't the Americans care?"
...On a trip to the Middle East this spring, we heard a constant refrain in capitals from the Persian Gulf to Israel, "Can you please explain what
your president is doing?" "Why is he walking away?" "Why is he so blithely sacrificing the hard fought gains you secured in Iraq?" "Why is he
abandoning your friends?" "Why is he doing deals with your enemies?"...
No one is bringing up the problem that ISIL is invading a sovereign Iraq, right on the heels of a recent election in fact...
so indeed, Obama is saying that military combat action, war atrocities conducted by religious zealots is a justifiable method of operation towards any
AQ/ISIL must be only pesky groups of like minded individuals with every right to kill, maim, steal, rape, plunder a Sovereign State as a normal course
of protest to affect societal change
Obama is denying the presence of a horde of Jihadists, and tells the Iraqi government this chaos in the country is a result of governmental policy
that is not 'inclusive' enough
so, Obama is rigidly adhering to his view that there are No 'Bad' Islamists
Jihad is just one of the acceptable means of practicing the religion,
extreme Jihad is not criminal or viewed as aggression... (thus doing away with civil liberties/rights & Constitutional protections)
Obama sluffing off the actions in Iraq by ISIL is in actuality bulking up the foundation pillars of the 'Obama Doctrine'...
(no matter Who began or initiated the invasion of Iraq by the extremist Jihadists of ISIL..
the sudden mission-change from fighting the Assad Forces to causing 'regime change' in Iraq is a matter which begs to be investigated)
How might the Obama Doctrine look like if the Jihad actions in Iraq were instituted in the USA Homeland =>
I guess that only federal government infrastructure would be protected... that public protection would be cost-prohibitive, and civilians will just
be so much collateral-damage
States would need to protect their own government continuity & It's populations as best they can
~OBEY~ there are no bad Islamists, Jihadists are a necessary component of Islam
edit on th30140327178420432014 by St Udio
because: (no reason given)